From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/4] i2c-multi-instantiate pseudo driver
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 13:40:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180809114046.21366-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi All,
Here is v6 of my patch-series for dealing with multiple independent i2c
devices being described in a single ACPI fwnode.
Changes in v6:
-Added some Reviewed-by and Acked-by-s to patches 2-4
-4th patch "platform/x86: Add ACPI i2c-multi-instantiate pseudo driver":
-s/irq_idx/gpio_irq_idx/
Changes in v5:
-Only changes in the 4th patch "platform/x86: Add ACPI i2c-multi-instantiate pseudo driver":
-s/no_clients/num_clients/
Changes in v4:
-Rewrite commit message of first patch as this is NOT a bug fix for
acpi_is_indirect_io_slave() as I thought at first, it is still necessary
as a preperation patch for the rest of the series
-MAINTAINER and Kconfig entry fixes
-Some minor coding style fixes
Changes in v3:
-Drop the patch adding the I2C_CLIENT_IGNORE_BUSY flag/hack
-Add patches to make ACPI fwnode-s with affected acpi_ids get enumerated as
platform device instead of i2c-client
-Change the i2c-multi-instantiate driver to a platform driver
Changes in v2:
-Rebase on 4.18-rc2
Changes in v1:
-Second attempt at dealing with this using a new design where a separate
driver (which can be build as a module) is used to instantiate the
i2c-clients instead of modifying the i2c core
-Add an I2C_CLIENT_IGNORE_BUSY flag to make it possible for this driver to bind
to the client instantiated for the first i2c resource and still create a new
client using the i2c_client_id for the actual driver for the first resource,
resulting in 2 clients at the same address (of which one is inactive)
Regards,
Hans
next reply other threads:[~2018-08-09 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-09 11:40 Hans de Goede [this message]
2018-08-09 11:40 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] ACPI / scan: Initialize status to ACPI_STA_DEFAULT Hans de Goede
2018-08-09 11:40 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for fwnodes with multiple i2c devices Hans de Goede
2018-08-09 11:40 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] ACPI / x86-utils: Remove status workaround from acpi_device_always_present() Hans de Goede
2018-08-09 11:40 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] platform/x86: Add ACPI i2c-multi-instantiate pseudo driver Hans de Goede
2018-08-09 11:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-08-09 12:08 ` Hans de Goede
2018-08-12 11:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180809114046.21366-1-hdegoede@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).