From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: acpi: Prepare for longer MADTs Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 14:22:47 +0000 Message-ID: <20181101142247.GB27913@e107155-lin> References: <20181012192937.3819951-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> <20181101113136.GA6608@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181101113136.GA6608@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Jeremy Linton , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, james.morse@arm.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, Sudeep Holla , ahs3@redhat.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:31:36AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:29:37PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote: > > The BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY check is a little too strict because > > it rejects MADT entries that don't match the currently known > > lengths. We should remove this restriction to avoid problems > > if the table length changes. Future code which might depend on > > additional fields should be written to validate those fields > > before using them, rather than trying to globally check > > known MADT version lengths. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton > > --- > > arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 8 ++++---- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > Hi Jeremy, > > I assume there is no [PATCH 1/2] (to make sure I have not missed > anything). > IIRC, it's a patch fixing module device table entry for SPE. They are independent, just happened to be put out together. -- Regards, Sudeep