public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / property: fix handling of data_nodes in acpi_get_next_subnode()
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 19:47:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190430164744.GO9224@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba56e822-92ee-7a75-5c62-45f3a572ccde@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:41:50AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 4/30/19 11:30 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:52:29AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > When the DSDT tables expose devices with subdevices and a set of
> > > hierarchical _DSD properties, the data returned by
> > > acpi_get_next_subnode() is incorrect, with the results suggesting a bad
> > > pointer assignment. The parser works fine with device_nodes or
> > > data_nodes, but not with a combination of the two.
> > > 
> > > The problem is traced to an invalid pointer used when jumping from
> > > handling device_nodes to data nodes. The existing code looks for data
> > > nodes below the last subdevice found instead of the common root. Fix
> > > by forcing the acpi_device pointer to be derived from the same fwnode
> > > for the two types of subnodes.
> > > 
> > > This same problem of handling device and data nodes was already fixed
> > > in a similar way by 'commit bf4703fdd166 ("ACPI / property: fix data
> > > node parsing in acpi_get_next_subnode()")' but broken later by 'commit
> > > 34055190b19 ("ACPI / property: Add fwnode_get_next_child_node()")', so
> > > this should probably go to linux-stable all the way to 4.12
> > 
> > Period is missed in above sentence.
> > 
> > I think it make sense to add Fixes: tag.
> 
> Thanks Andy for the review. I hesitated to add a fixes tag. The line about
> resetting the adev pointer was indeed removed in the latter commit, but
> there were a slew of other changes done later by Sakari on hierarchical _DSD
> so it's quite complicated to say when this was last fully functional.

I see, btw, you forgot to add Sakari to Cc list, he is doing a lot lately WRT
device properties.

> > Nevertheless,
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Thank you for fixing this interesting issue!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-30 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-30 15:52 [PATCH] ACPI / property: fix handling of data_nodes in acpi_get_next_subnode() Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-04-30 15:52 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-04-30 16:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-30 16:30   ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-30 16:41   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-04-30 16:41     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-04-30 16:47     ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2019-04-30 16:47       ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-05-01  8:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-01  8:11   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190430164744.GO9224@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox