From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: baytrail: Really serialize all register accesses
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 19:37:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191120173758.GR32742@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119160917.GM11621@lahna.fi.intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 06:09:17PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 04:46:41PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Commit 39ce8150a079 ("pinctrl: baytrail: Serialize all register access")
> > added a spinlock around all register accesses because:
> >
> > "There is a hardware issue in Intel Baytrail where concurrent GPIO register
> > access might result reads of 0xffffffff and writes might get dropped
> > completely."
> >
> > Testing has shown that this does not catch all cases, there are still
> > 2 problems remaining
> >
> > 1) The original fix uses a spinlock per byt_gpio device / struct,
> > additional testing has shown that this is not sufficient concurent
> > accesses to 2 different GPIO banks also suffer from the same problem.
> >
> > This commit fixes this by moving to a single global lock.
> >
> > 2) The original fix did not add a lock around the register accesses in
> > the suspend/resume handling.
> >
> > Since pinctrl-baytrail.c is using normal suspend/resume handlers,
> > interrupts are still enabled during suspend/resume handling. Nothing
> > should be using the GPIOs when they are being taken down, _but_ the
> > GPIOs themselves may still cause interrupts, which are likely to
> > use (read) the triggering GPIO. So we need to protect against
> > concurrent GPIO register accesses in the suspend/resume handlers too.
> >
> > This commit fixes this by adding the missing spin_lock / unlock calls.
> >
> > The 2 fixes together fix the Acer Switch 10 SW5-012 getting completely
> > confused after a suspend resume. The DSDT for this device has a bug
> > in its _LID method which reprograms the home and power button trigger-
> > flags requesting both high and low _level_ interrupts so the IRQs for
> > these 2 GPIOs continuously fire. This combined with the saving of
> > registers during suspend, triggers concurrent GPIO register accesses
> > resulting in saving 0xffffffff as pconf0 value during suspend and then
> > when restoring this on resume the pinmux settings get all messed up,
> > resulting in various I2C busses being stuck, the wifi no longer working
> > and often the tablet simply not coming out of suspend at all.
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: 39ce8150a079 ("pinctrl: baytrail: Serialize all register access")
> > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>
> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-20 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-19 15:46 [PATCH v2] pinctrl: baytrail: Really serialize all register accesses Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 16:09 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-11-20 17:37 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191120173758.GR32742@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox