Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: treat dev->bus_dma_mask as a DMA limit

Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-21T16:02:28Z

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:55:39PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hmm, there's no functional dependency though, is there? AFAICS it's
> essentially just a context conflict. Is it worth simply dropping (or
> postponing) the local renaming in __dma_direct_optimal_gfp_mask(), or
> perhaps even cross-merging arm64/for-next/zone-dma into dma/for-next?

I would have no problem with pulling it in. I'd kinda hate creating
the conflict, though. So if the arm64 maintainers are fine with it
I'll pull it in, especially if I get an ACK from Robin.