From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB86C43603 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 20:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091EE2166E for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 20:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="TGXKqDqx" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726976AbfLPU3O (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:29:14 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:36174 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726949AbfLPU3O (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:29:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1576528153; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x2+gaSqShRjI9TwRpQ1ymZ0YBhaNrVlTtmkRQd+AJA0=; b=TGXKqDqxif9uLlMAt0IYfBIRLTm/FipokgQtR+ztHnPXHaDFmvNwRIAh0TVpWAIcemdal3 OLHtoCudhXMRBNBTWkc9E4QaPjp1VJy64v/FfKLzr0Q/uGWIhVxsWrQ9d+5jhVUqZtg9Mj 1zhrgTa4c6acIvlCvrpO3GPP0PDZFms= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-297-aLMJHBYmN3agL3oLRkyuoA-1; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:29:12 -0500 X-MC-Unique: aLMJHBYmN3agL3oLRkyuoA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E27618A6EC1; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 20:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shalem.localdomain.com (ovpn-116-96.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.96]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99095C219; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 20:29:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Hans de Goede To: Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , =?UTF-8?q?Ville=20Syrj=C3=A4l=C3=A4?= , intel-gfx , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Lee Jones Cc: Hans de Goede , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [CI 0/3] drm/i915 / LPSS / mfd: Select correct PWM controller to use based on VBT Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 21:29:03 +0100 Message-Id: <20191216202906.1662893-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi All, Somehow the CI system did not pick up this series the first time, there are no test results recorded for it: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/69685 So this is a resend for CI to do its thing. As soon as CI is happy with this I will push this to drm-intel-next-queued. Regards, Hans