Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [pm:intel_idle+acpi 4/10] acpi_processor.c:undefined reference to `acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe'

[Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>]

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 09:23:14AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 1:31 AM Li, Philip <philip.li@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Subject: [kbuild-all] Re: [pm:intel_idle+acpi 4/10] acpi_processor.c:undefined
> > > reference to `acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe'
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 2:26 PM kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git
> > > intel_idle+acpi
> > > > head:   dcedc03145600b929a32acb85b212131b079bc46
> > > > commit: 0300cf31f061e6287810c894337f29df2e200e2d [4/10] ACPI: processor:
> > > Export acpi_processor_evaluate_cst()
> > >
> > > Outdated.  Please stop sending these.
> > thanks for the input Rafael, we will ignore the following tests on it.
> 
> Well, the branch has been rebased since then and effectively it is a new one.
> 
> My point is that if something like that happens, the script should
> discard the old branch and pull the new one from scratch.
Got it, sorry for wrong understanding. We will add logic to judge the rebase
to reduce the later meaningless reports. Currently we only support the checking
of new patch set version in mailing list.