From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905B7C43603 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604222072D for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727260AbfLQKuD (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 05:50:03 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:1450 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726655AbfLQKuC (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 05:50:02 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Dec 2019 02:50:01 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,325,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="221735328" Received: from pl-dbox.sh.intel.com (HELO intel.com) ([10.239.13.128]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2019 02:49:59 -0800 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:57:47 +0800 From: Philip Li To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: lkp , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "kbuild-all@lists.01.org" , ACPI Devel Maling List , "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" , Linux PM Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [pm:intel_idle+acpi 4/10] acpi_processor.c:undefined reference to `acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe' Message-ID: <20191217105747.GF9122@intel.com> References: <201912162148.hTRbNfPp%lkp@intel.com> <831EE4E5E37DCC428EB295A351E66249522A215D@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 09:23:14AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 1:31 AM Li, Philip wrote: > > > > > Subject: [kbuild-all] Re: [pm:intel_idle+acpi 4/10] acpi_processor.c:undefined > > > reference to `acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe' > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 2:26 PM kbuild test robot wrote: > > > > > > > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git > > > intel_idle+acpi > > > > head: dcedc03145600b929a32acb85b212131b079bc46 > > > > commit: 0300cf31f061e6287810c894337f29df2e200e2d [4/10] ACPI: processor: > > > Export acpi_processor_evaluate_cst() > > > > > > Outdated. Please stop sending these. > > thanks for the input Rafael, we will ignore the following tests on it. > > Well, the branch has been rebased since then and effectively it is a new one. > > My point is that if something like that happens, the script should > discard the old branch and pull the new one from scratch. Got it, sorry for wrong understanding. We will add logic to judge the rebase to reduce the later meaningless reports. Currently we only support the checking of new patch set version in mailing list.