Re: [patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros

Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20T21:52:57Z

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:30 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 9, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL),
> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 13, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL),
> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 3, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL),
> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 4, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL),
> >
> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0),
> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0),
> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0),
> >
> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0),
> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0),
> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0),
> >
> > Perhaps use names instead of 6 and 15?
>
> Thought about that and did not come up with anyting useful. FAM6 vs. 6
> is not really any better

Hmm... Do we have family 15 for Intel? Perhaps I missed something...
Or is it for any family?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko