Re: [patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros

Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20T14:50:25Z

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> The new macro set has a consistent namespace and uses C99 initializers
> instead of the grufty C89 ones.
>
> Get rid the of most local macro wrappers for consistency. The ones which
> make sense for readability are renamed to X86_MATCH*.
>
> In the centrino driver this also removes the two extra duplicates of family
> 6 model 13 which have no value at all.

> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 9, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL),
> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 13, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL),
> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 3, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL),
> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 4, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL),

> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0),
> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0),
> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0),

> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0),
> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0),
> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0),

Perhaps use names instead of 6 and 15?
Also, NULL vs. 0?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko