From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] PM, libnvdimm: Add 'mem-quiet' state and callback for firmware activation
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:00:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200709150051.GA17342@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159408717289.2385045.14094866475168644020.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 06:59:32PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> The runtime firmware activation capability of Intel NVDIMM devices
> requires memory transactions to be disabled for 100s of microseconds.
> This timeout is large enough to cause in-flight DMA to fail and other
> application detectable timeouts. Arrange for firmware activation to be
> executed while the system is "quiesced", all processes and device-DMA
> frozen.
>
> It is already required that invoking device ->freeze() callbacks is
> sufficient to cease DMA. A device that continues memory writes outside
> of user-direction violates expectations of the PM core to be to
> establish a coherent hibernation image.
>
> That said, RDMA devices are an example of a device that access memory
> outside of user process direction. RDMA drivers also typically assume
> the system they are operating in will never be hibernated. A solution
> for RDMA collisions with firmware activation is outside the scope of
> this change and may need to rely on being able to survive the platform
> imposed memory controller quiesce period.
Yikes. I don't think we should support such a broken runtime firmware
activation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-09 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-07 1:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] ACPI/NVDIMM: Runtime Firmware Activation Dan Williams
2020-07-07 1:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] libnvdimm: Validate command family indices Dan Williams
2020-07-07 1:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] ACPI: NFIT: Move bus_dsm_mask out of generic nvdimm_bus_descriptor Dan Williams
2020-07-07 1:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] ACPI: NFIT: Define runtime firmware activation commands Dan Williams
2020-07-07 1:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] tools/testing/nvdimm: Cleanup dimm index passing Dan Williams
2020-07-07 1:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] tools/testing/nvdimm: Add command debug messages Dan Williams
2020-07-07 1:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] tools/testing/nvdimm: Prepare nfit_ctl_test() for ND_CMD_CALL emulation Dan Williams
2020-07-07 1:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] tools/testing/nvdimm: Emulate firmware activation commands Dan Williams
2020-07-07 1:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] driver-core: Introduce DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_{RO,RW} Dan Williams
2020-07-07 1:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] libnvdimm: Convert to DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_RO() Dan Williams
2020-07-07 1:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] libnvdimm: Add runtime firmware activation sysfs interface Dan Williams
2020-07-07 1:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] PM, libnvdimm: Add 'mem-quiet' state and callback for firmware activation Dan Williams
2020-07-07 16:56 ` Pavel Machek
2020-07-09 14:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-09 19:04 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-13 14:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-09 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-07-09 15:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-07-09 15:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-09 16:10 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-09 16:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-07-09 15:56 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-07 1:59 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] ACPI: NFIT: Add runtime firmware activate support Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200709150051.GA17342@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox