From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A428C433DF for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A5D20866 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726713AbgHNPSf (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:18:35 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:20311 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726212AbgHNPSe (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:18:34 -0400 IronPort-SDR: cKMKG9U2lW+biuo9xDZMPpjh8q4ItoyvGGdBKdfqPsNVcVPcO84DWZAyzwYXFogj+wZTktPPRl /oGLLUwLryUg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9713"; a="152070815" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,312,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="152070815" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Aug 2020 08:18:33 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 9KukKRZEbBE89Aa0i5lUa9PRn36Xj+MMGtpiNX/YHfMr/1mQq8mW8wLyTwVuVA266VPoNqlOS7 lKgl5bn2T0uQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,312,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="325750478" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Aug 2020 08:18:31 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1k6bTS-008fum-De; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 18:18:30 +0300 Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 18:18:30 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , ACPI Devel Maling List , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan , Bjorn Helgaas , Linux PCI Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] PCI/ACPI: Fix description of @handle for acpi_is_root_bridge() Message-ID: <20200814151830.GP1891694@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20200813175729.15088-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20200813175729.15088-6-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 05:11:55PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:57 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > Fix description of handle parameter in documentation of acpi_is_root_bridge(). > > Otherwise we get the following warning: > > > > CHECK drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c:71: warning: Function parameter or member 'handle' not described in 'acpi_is_root_bridge' > > I'm not sure why this patch doesn't go by itself. It appears to be > immediately applicable. Just appears when I working on the rest of the series. Can be standalone if it makes more sense. > I'll apply it next week if Bjorn doesn't object. At least fine with me, thanks! > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > > Cc: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org > > --- > > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > > index 2a6a741896de..f723679954d7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(osc_lock); > > > > /** > > * acpi_is_root_bridge - determine whether an ACPI CA node is a PCI root bridge > > - * @handle - the ACPI CA node in question. > > + * @handle: the ACPI CA node in question. > > * > > * Note: we could make this API take a struct acpi_device * instead, but > > * for now, it's more convenient to operate on an acpi_handle. > > -- > > 2.28.0 > > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko