From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9C4C433E2 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2942087D for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:54:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600368877; bh=M2gFxqmtjjAWg/oGRYKTsRTZLNarF0mdV6aFeWm3RZ0=; h=Date:From:To:To:To:Cc:Cc:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: List-ID:From; b=V/+dA4bKJ301AJ6et8c3SckHS54TxSHM8eT8wpA5PdlO2WLnzBOK3kYYUSSDazMeM j21Jk3NiW/kOgUNh+iIWjIepWXgJTqQk4xDX5Btg+lxWbOh5OfkdS8Rui618Yv+E2q MHUQd5XG+EclMpFEToVadZp1qsQPuFz8030/XFq4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726441AbgIQSy3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:54:29 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37040 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728426AbgIQQU3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 12:20:29 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [70.37.104.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7968020708; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:53:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600358008; bh=M2gFxqmtjjAWg/oGRYKTsRTZLNarF0mdV6aFeWm3RZ0=; h=Date:From:To:To:To:Cc:Cc:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TEY4P/Z3V+4nyTHT7QFM+b9jJ808FfgkCUxfwlUjqmEkEUhNGePV4gKg62ZHv3pxI ZKZebu2xtPd0qiW/5vzX39rvcBt9Uk4rv0A80HTwJ18DdzthDRzD6lWD7IHXI9l7vd fn6nCdxi5LxPQ0prWjyyln4mK0fcMX3OyrNZ1Ndw= Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:53:27 +0000 From: Sasha Levin To: Sasha Levin To: Alex Hung To: rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][V2] ACPI: video: use ACPI backlight for HP 635 Notebook In-Reply-To: <20200913223403.59175-1-alex.hung@canonical.com> References: <20200913223403.59175-1-alex.hung@canonical.com> Message-Id: <20200917155328.7968020708@mail.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all The bot has tested the following trees: v5.8.9, v5.4.65, v4.19.145, v4.14.198, v4.9.236, v4.4.236. v5.8.9: Build OK! v5.4.65: Build OK! v4.19.145: Build OK! v4.14.198: Build OK! v4.9.236: Build OK! v4.4.236: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 49eb5208220a ("ACPI / video: Add a quirk to force acpi-video backlight on SAMSUNG 530U4E/540U4E") NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks Sasha