From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] ACPI: scan: Call acpi_get_object_info() from acpi_add_single_object()
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 21:30:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201121203040.146252-3-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201121203040.146252-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
Call acpi_get_object_info() from acpi_add_single_object() instead of
calling it from acpi_set_pnp_ids() and pass the result down to the
acpi_set_pnp_ids() call.
This is a preparation patch for splitting the scanning of the root
into 2 steps, deferring the addition of some devices which need access
to OpRegions of other devices during scanning to the second step.
Having the acpi_device_info available earlier is useful for making
the decision on whether to defer the device addition or not, without
needing to make a second acpi_get_object_info() call.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
drivers/acpi/internal.h | 3 ++-
drivers/acpi/power.c | 2 +-
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
index e3638bafb941..cb229e24c563 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
@@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ struct acpi_device_bus_id {
int acpi_device_add(struct acpi_device *device,
void (*release)(struct device *));
void acpi_init_device_object(struct acpi_device *device, acpi_handle handle,
- int type, unsigned long long sta);
+ int type, unsigned long long sta,
+ struct acpi_device_info *info);
int acpi_device_setup_files(struct acpi_device *dev);
void acpi_device_remove_files(struct acpi_device *dev);
void acpi_device_add_finalize(struct acpi_device *device);
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/power.c b/drivers/acpi/power.c
index 8048da85b7e0..189a0d4c6d06 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/power.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/power.c
@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ int acpi_add_power_resource(acpi_handle handle)
device = &resource->device;
acpi_init_device_object(device, handle, ACPI_BUS_TYPE_POWER,
- ACPI_STA_DEFAULT);
+ ACPI_STA_DEFAULT, NULL);
mutex_init(&resource->resource_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource->list_node);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource->dependents);
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index e949265d5667..25a46ae24229 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1258,10 +1258,8 @@ static bool acpi_object_is_system_bus(acpi_handle handle)
}
static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp,
- int device_type)
+ int device_type, struct acpi_device_info *info)
{
- acpi_status status;
- struct acpi_device_info *info;
struct acpi_pnp_device_id_list *cid_list;
int i;
@@ -1272,8 +1270,7 @@ static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp,
break;
}
- status = acpi_get_object_info(handle, &info);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ if (!info) {
pr_err(PREFIX "%s: Error reading device info\n",
__func__);
return;
@@ -1298,8 +1295,6 @@ static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp,
if (info->valid & ACPI_VALID_CLS)
acpi_add_id(pnp, info->class_code.string);
- kfree(info);
-
/*
* Some devices don't reliably have _HIDs & _CIDs, so add
* synthetic HIDs to make sure drivers can find them.
@@ -1605,7 +1600,8 @@ static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device)
}
void acpi_init_device_object(struct acpi_device *device, acpi_handle handle,
- int type, unsigned long long sta)
+ int type, unsigned long long sta,
+ struct acpi_device_info *info)
{
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&device->pnp.ids);
device->device_type = type;
@@ -1614,7 +1610,7 @@ void acpi_init_device_object(struct acpi_device *device, acpi_handle handle,
device->fwnode.ops = &acpi_device_fwnode_ops;
acpi_set_device_status(device, sta);
acpi_device_get_busid(device);
- acpi_set_pnp_ids(handle, &device->pnp, type);
+ acpi_set_pnp_ids(handle, &device->pnp, type, info);
acpi_init_properties(device);
acpi_bus_get_flags(device);
device->flags.match_driver = false;
@@ -1642,14 +1638,20 @@ static int acpi_add_single_object(struct acpi_device **child,
int result;
struct acpi_device *device;
struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
+ struct acpi_device_info *info = NULL;
+
+ if (handle != ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT && type == ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE)
+ acpi_get_object_info(handle, &info);
device = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_device), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!device) {
printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Memory allocation error\n");
+ kfree(info);
return -ENOMEM;
}
- acpi_init_device_object(device, handle, type, sta);
+ acpi_init_device_object(device, handle, type, sta, info);
+ kfree(info);
/*
* For ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE getting the status is delayed till here so
* that we can call acpi_bus_get_status() and use its quirk handling.
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-21 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-21 20:30 [PATCH 0/7] ACPI: scan: Split root scanning into 2 steps Hans de Goede
2020-11-21 20:30 ` [PATCH 1/7] ACPI: scan: Add an acpi_info_matches_hids() helper Hans de Goede
2020-11-21 20:30 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2020-11-21 20:30 ` [PATCH 3/7] ACPI: scan: Add a separate cleanup exit-path to acpi_scan_init() Hans de Goede
2020-11-21 20:30 ` [PATCH 4/7] ACPI: scan: Split root scanning into 2 steps Hans de Goede
2020-11-21 20:30 ` [PATCH 5/7] ACPI: scan: Add support for deferring adding devices to the second scan phase based on the _DEP list Hans de Goede
2020-11-23 12:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-23 13:30 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-23 12:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-23 13:49 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-21 20:30 ` [PATCH 6/7] ACPI: scan: Fix battery devices not working with acpi.defer_scan_based_on_dep=1 Hans de Goede
2020-12-02 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-21 20:30 ` [PATCH 7/7] ACPI: scan: Add some HIDs which are never bound on Cherry Trail devices to acpi_ignore_dep_hids Hans de Goede
2020-12-02 13:49 ` [PATCH 0/7] ACPI: scan: Split root scanning into 2 steps Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-02 15:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-02 19:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-02 19:39 ` Hans de Goede
2020-12-02 19:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-03 9:53 ` Hans de Goede
2020-12-03 14:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-05 15:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-05 17:02 ` Hans de Goede
2020-12-07 17:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-07 18:15 ` Hans de Goede
2021-04-29 3:43 ` [PATCH] ACPI: scan: Defer enumeration of devices with _DEP lists youling257
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201121203040.146252-3-hdegoede@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox