From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_RED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5C1C433E0 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A83206E9 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2395397AbhASOSN (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 09:18:13 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:56091 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731808AbhASJm5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 04:42:57 -0500 IronPort-SDR: 2+0q67q8GBU3/KckoNoXFYkGbkfh/R04KpJtvCyHA7qOLu3mE9mUwrrahVNWr5XELwKSuaJ9fg W5lRDlnF3Cgw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9868"; a="263710730" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,358,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="263710730" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2021 01:41:00 -0800 IronPort-SDR: 4TZ3Mo3Tu7C/tfZdY7fsSqYsn9yNgc+q6areqBN1q+dAU4F8Pn89V95q9Ae319iCJELd6D6ztg PezPEO3U27Yg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,358,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="365678805" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2021 01:40:57 -0800 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l1nWR-003M1r-QO; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:41:59 +0200 Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:41:59 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , AceLan Kao , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mika Westerberg , Len Brown , "open list:ACPI" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / device_sysfs: Use OF_MODALIAS for "compatible" modalias Message-ID: <20210119094159.GQ4077@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20210119081513.300938-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:41:48PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 4:27 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:15:13PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: ... > > Who will use OF_MODALIAS and where have you documented it? > > After this lands in mainline, I'll modify the pull request for systemd > to add a new rule for OF_MODALIAS. > I'll modify the comment on the function to document the change. I'm wondering why to have two fixes in two places instead of fixing udev to understand multiple MODALIAS= events? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko