From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] hwmon: acpi_power_meter: Get rid of ACPICA message printing
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 19:20:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210306032058.GB192807@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1890478.AxU35vj7Mz@kreacher>
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:43:54PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Use acpi_evaluation_failure_warn() introduced previously instead of
> the ACPICA-specific ACPI_EXCEPTION() macro to log warning messages
> regarding ACPI object evaluation failures and use dev_err() instead
> of ACPI_EXCEPTION() to log _PMC package parsing failures, which is
> consistent with the other messages printed by the code in question.
>
> Next, drop the ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition only used by the ACPICA
> message printing macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
>
> #define ACPI_POWER_METER_NAME "power_meter"
> -ACPI_MODULE_NAME(ACPI_POWER_METER_NAME);
> #define ACPI_POWER_METER_DEVICE_NAME "Power Meter"
> #define ACPI_POWER_METER_CLASS "pwr_meter_resource"
>
> @@ -114,7 +113,8 @@ static int update_avg_interval(struct ac
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_GAI",
> NULL, &data);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _GAI"));
> + acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_GAI",
> + status);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> @@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ static ssize_t set_avg_interval(struct d
> mutex_unlock(&resource->lock);
>
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PAI"));
> + acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PAI",
> + status);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -186,7 +187,8 @@ static int update_cap(struct acpi_power_
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_GHL",
> NULL, &data);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _GHL"));
> + acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_GHL",
> + status);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> @@ -237,7 +239,8 @@ static ssize_t set_cap(struct device *de
> mutex_unlock(&resource->lock);
>
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _SHL"));
> + acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_SHL",
> + status);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -270,7 +273,8 @@ static int set_acpi_trip(struct acpi_pow
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PTP",
> &args, &data);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PTP"));
> + acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PTP",
> + status);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -322,7 +326,8 @@ static int update_meter(struct acpi_powe
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PMM",
> NULL, &data);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PMM"));
> + acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PMM",
> + status);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> @@ -549,7 +554,8 @@ static int read_domain_devices(struct ac
> status = acpi_evaluate_object(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PMD", NULL,
> &buffer);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PMD"));
> + acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PMD",
> + status);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> @@ -745,7 +751,8 @@ static int read_capabilities(struct acpi
> status = acpi_evaluate_object(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PMC", NULL,
> &buffer);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PMC"));
> + acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PMC",
> + status);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> @@ -765,7 +772,9 @@ static int read_capabilities(struct acpi
>
> status = acpi_extract_package(pss, &format, &state);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Invalid data"));
> + dev_err(&resource->acpi_dev->dev, ACPI_POWER_METER_NAME
> + "_PMC package parsing failed: %s\n",
> + acpi_format_exception(status));
> res = -EFAULT;
> goto end;
> }
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-06 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-05 18:39 [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: New helper for warning messages and replacing ACPI_EXCEPTION() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-05 18:40 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] ACPI: processor: perflib: Eliminate redundant status check Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-05 18:41 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] ACPI: utils: Introduce acpi_evaluation_failure_warn() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-05 18:42 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] IIO: acpi-als: Get rid of ACPICA message printing Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-06 14:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-03-05 18:43 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] hwmon: acpi_power_meter: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-06 3:20 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210306032058.GB192807@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox