From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B38C433ED for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 09:48:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E29613BD for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 09:48:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230032AbhD1JtT (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 05:49:19 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:56524 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238277AbhD1JtT (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 05:49:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1619603314; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=y04zd6fW1Eb2Q5W4r93j3/pSOFEh/Z5A0rPT+2bNFSY=; b=Xv0HyLBxMjzT6AaF7iVKGATVRo48nmM79J/Ay3OhdnUN2NqHMvdog+iMJQ/WcZMP9sO+rQ 7+O0ryiyjqRbdqcB2CjaTyxtRe9ozb/QMwxSuXAfn86Tmxdy+aXG3Eml2ZRwqhB6MXieO5 +ZVHSG8/sJjIMF1uEypYkZGdnYqWQkw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-373-yB9gVyDBOFGTyjPHqPgZFQ-1; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 05:48:29 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yB9gVyDBOFGTyjPHqPgZFQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80B2B803620; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 09:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gator.redhat.com (unknown [10.40.192.243]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D4D5D6D5; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 09:48:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Andrew Jones To: song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com Cc: aubrey.li@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de, bsegall@google.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, guodong.xu@linaro.org, hpa@zytor.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, lenb@kernel.org, liguozhu@hisilicon.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@openeuler.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com, msys.mizuma@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, prime.zeng@hisilicon.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, rostedt@goodmis.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, will@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, xuwei5@huawei.com, yangyicong@huawei.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/4] topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within a die Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:48:11 +0200 Message-Id: <20210428094811.159245-1-drjones@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210420001844.9116-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> References: <20210420001844.9116-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 20/04/2021 12:18, Barry Song wrote: ... > Currently the ID provided is the offset of the Processor > Hierarchy Nodes Structure within PPTT. Whilst this is unique > it is not terribly elegant so alternative suggestions welcome. > The ACPI table offsets are consistent with how other topology IDs are generated. I once tried to make them a little more human friendly with [1], but it was nacked. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180629132934.GA16282@e107155-lin/t/ Thanks, drew