public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] acpi: add a helper for retrieving _OSC Control DWORDs
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:04:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220330190443.GA1700287@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220330181434.1515791-2-vishal.l.verma@intel.com>

Look at previous subject lines and copy the style instead of making up
something new.

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 12:14:32PM -0600, Vishal Verma wrote:
> During _OSC negotiation, when the 'Control' DWORD is needed from the
> result buffer after running _OSC, a couple of places performed manual
> pointer arithmetic to offset into the right spot in the raw buffer.
> Add a acpi_osc_ctx_get_pci_control() helper to use the #define'd
> DWORD offsets to fetch the DWORDs needed from @acpi_osc_context, and
> replace the above instances of the open-coded arithmetic.

Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-30 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-30 18:14 [PATCH v3 0/3] acpi: add support for CXL _OSC Vishal Verma
2022-03-30 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] acpi: add a helper for retrieving _OSC Control DWORDs Vishal Verma
2022-03-30 19:04   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-03-30 20:08     ` Verma, Vishal L
2022-03-30 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] PCI/ACPI: Use CXL _OSC instead of PCIe _OSC Vishal Verma
2022-03-30 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] acpi/pci_root: negotiate CXL _OSC Vishal Verma
2022-03-30 19:01   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-03-30 20:16     ` Verma, Vishal L
2022-03-30 20:30       ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220330190443.GA1700287@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox