From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 02/39] ACPI: add dependency on HAS_IOPORT
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 12:53:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220504175352.GA456913@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220429135108.2781579-3-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 03:50:00PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> not being declared. As ACPI always uses I/O port access we simply depend
> on HAS_IOPORT.
CONFIG_ACPI depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI, which is only set by arm64,
ia64, and x86, all of which support I/O port access. So does this
actually solve a problem? I wouldn't think you'd be able to build
ACPI on s390 even without this patch.
"ACPI always uses I/O port access" is a pretty broad brush, and it
would be useful to know specifically what the dependencies are.
Many ACPI hardware accesses use acpi_hw_read()/acpi_hw_write(), which
use either MMIO or I/O port accesses depending on what the firmware
told us.
> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index 1e34f846508f..8ad0d168004c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>
> config ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI
> bool
> + depends on HAS_IOPORT
>
> menuconfig ACPI
> bool "ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support"
> --
> 2.32.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-04 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220429135108.2781579-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
2022-04-29 13:50 ` [RFC v2 02/39] ACPI: add dependency on HAS_IOPORT Niklas Schnelle
2022-05-04 13:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-04 17:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-05-04 19:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-05-05 8:20 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-05-05 19:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-29 13:50 ` [PATCH 03/37] " Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-29 14:28 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-29 13:50 ` [PATCH 23/37] pnp: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-29 14:34 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-29 13:50 ` [RFC v2 27/39] " Niklas Schnelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220504175352.GA456913@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox