From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] PCI/ACPI: Link host bridge to its ACPI fw node
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 17:11:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220914221154.GA710889@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YxsTfVdOgc9sOOVm@rric.localdomain>
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 12:20:45PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 08.09.22 12:45:16, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 8:05 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Robert Richter wrote:
> > > > > A lookup of a host bridge's corresponding acpi device (struct
> > > > > acpi_device) is not possible, for example:
> > > > >
> > > > > adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&host_bridge->dev);
> > > > >
> > > > > This could be useful to find a host bridge's fwnode handle and to
> > > > > determine and call additional host bridge ACPI parameters and methods
> > > > > such as HID/CID or _UID.
> ...
> No, it is x86. And true, it is set. So this series is actually working
> without this patch. It can be dropped.
>
> Now, I just checked my logs. The reason I was adding this is that
> during code development I modified the code to have bridge->dev.parent
> set. Then, the fwnode is not linked. I later dropped that change but
> kept this patch.
If this patch does the same thing as the ACPI_COMPANION_SET() in
several pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() implementations, I would love to
keep this patch, which does it in a generic place, and drop the
corresponding code from those arch-specific functions.
But I don't understand the fwnode stuff well enough to know if this is
feasible.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-14 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220831081603.3415-1-rrichter@amd.com>
2022-08-31 8:15 ` [PATCH 06/15] PCI/ACPI: Link host bridge to its ACPI fw node Robert Richter
2022-08-31 10:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-09-07 18:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-09-07 20:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-09-08 6:05 ` Dan Williams
2022-09-08 13:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-09-08 19:45 ` Dan Williams
2022-09-09 10:20 ` Robert Richter
2022-09-14 22:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-09-16 23:16 ` Dan Williams
2022-09-08 13:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220914221154.GA710889@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox