From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@intel.com, bala.senthil@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: LPSS: use acpi_dev_uid_match() for matching _UID
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:18:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231027081855.GK3208943@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231026083335.12551-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 02:03:35PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> Now that we have a standard ACPI helper, we can use acpi_dev_uid_match()
> for matching _UID as per the original logic before commit 2a036e489eb1
> ("ACPI: LPSS: Refactor _UID handling to use acpi_dev_uid_to_integer()"),
> instead of treating it as an integer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
The change still looks good to me, however I wonder if we could maybe
improve acpi_dev_uid_match() to support both data types possible for
_UID? This of course is separate patch (unless there are objections).
There is the _Generic() thing and I think that can be used to make
acpi_dev_uid_match()
which takes either u64 (or maybe even unsigned int) or const char * and
based on that picks the correct implementation. Not sure if that's
possible, did not check but it would allow us to use one function
everywhere instead of acpi_dev_uid_to_integer() and
acpi_dev_uid_match().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-27 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-26 8:33 [PATCH v2] ACPI: LPSS: use acpi_dev_uid_match() for matching _UID Raag Jadav
2023-10-27 8:18 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2023-10-27 10:11 ` Raag Jadav
2023-10-27 14:17 ` Raag Jadav
2023-10-27 14:28 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-10-27 16:51 ` Raag Jadav
2023-10-27 17:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-10-27 17:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-10-28 8:58 ` Raag Jadav
2023-10-30 10:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-30 16:00 ` Raag Jadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231027081855.GK3208943@black.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bala.senthil@intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox