From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] cpuidle: RISC-V: Add ACPI LPI support
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:19:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240111-d37d338a6b1aa71e944ebe05@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240111093058.121838-3-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 03:00:58PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> Add required callbacks to support Low Power Idle (LPI) on ACPI based
> RISC-V platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> index e8094fc92491..cea67a54ab39 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> @@ -632,3 +632,81 @@ static int __init sbi_cpuidle_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
> device_initcall(sbi_cpuidle_init);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <acpi/processor.h>
> +
> +#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK 0x1000000000000000ULL
> +#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_RSVD_MASK 0x0FFFFFFF00000000ULL
GENMASK might look nicer and the type mask is 0xF000000000000000ULL,
where 0x1000000000000000ULL means that the type is an SBI identifier.
We need both defined
#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK 0xF000000000000000ULL
#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_SBI 0x1000000000000000ULL
as I point out below.
> +
> +static int acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi;
> + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
> +
> + if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * The SBI HSM suspend function is only available when:
> + * 1) SBI version is 0.3 or higher
> + * 2) SBI HSM extension is available
> + */
> + if (sbi_spec_version < sbi_mk_version(0, 3) ||
> + !sbi_probe_extension(SBI_EXT_HSM)) {
> + pr_warn("HSM suspend not available\n");
The comment and these lines match what's done in sbi_cpuidle_init().
How about a static helper function to avoid duplication?
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (pr->power.count <= 1)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + for (i = 1; i < pr->power.count; i++) {
> + u32 state;
> +
> + lpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[i];
> +
> + /* Validate Entry Method as per FFH spec.
> + * bits[63:60] should be 0x1
> + * bits[59:32] should be 0x0
> + * bits[31:0] represent a SBI power_state
^ an
> + */
Comment block needs opening wing (/*)
> + if (!(lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK) ||
This should be (lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK) != RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_SBI
> + (lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_RSVD_MASK)) {
> + pr_warn("Invalid LPI entry method %#llx\n", lpi->address);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + state = lpi->address;
> + if (!sbi_suspend_state_is_valid(state)) {
> + pr_warn("Invalid SBI power state %#x\n", state);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu);
> +}
> +
> +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi)
> +{
> + u32 state = lpi->address;
> +
> + if (state & SBI_HSM_SUSP_NON_RET_BIT)
> + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
> + lpi->index,
> + state);
> + else
> + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
> + lpi->index,
> + state);
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Thanks,
drew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-11 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-11 9:30 [PATCH -next 0/2] RISC-V: ACPI: Add LPI support Sunil V L
2024-01-11 9:30 ` [PATCH -next 1/2] ACPI: Enable ACPI_PROCESSOR for RISC-V Sunil V L
2024-01-11 10:00 ` Andrew Jones
2024-01-11 11:29 ` Sunil V L
2024-01-11 12:16 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-01-11 12:28 ` Andrew Jones
2024-01-11 9:30 ` [PATCH -next 2/2] cpuidle: RISC-V: Add ACPI LPI support Sunil V L
2024-01-11 10:19 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2024-01-11 11:31 ` Sunil V L
2024-01-12 5:05 ` Anup Patel
2024-01-15 5:07 ` Sunil V L
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240111-d37d338a6b1aa71e944ebe05@orel \
--to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sunilvl@ventanamicro.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox