From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] gpiolib: Align prototypes of *gpio_count() APIs
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:43:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240301064358.GL8454@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240229145303.3801332-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 04:51:37PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Two out of three GPIO count APIs take device pointer. OF case clearly
> does not need it as it immediately switches to device node inside, and
> ACPI abstracts that to struct acpi_device pointer. Unify all these by
> making them to take struct fwnode_handle pointer. This, in particular,
> will allow to create fwnode_gpio_count() API if needed. The need of that
> was discussed here [1].
>
> Note, no functional changes intended.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2ad735ed-963c-4e75-b83e-687ea2c0aef5@alliedtelesis.co.nz [1]
>
> In v2:
> - fixed typo (Chris)
> - added tag (Linus)
>
> Andy Shevchenko (2):
> gpiolib-of: Make of_gpio_get_count() take firmware node as a parameter
> gpiolib-acpi: Make acpi_gpio_count() take firmware node as a parameter
For both,
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-01 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-29 14:51 [PATCH v2 0/2] gpiolib: Align prototypes of *gpio_count() APIs Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-29 14:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib-of: Make of_gpio_get_count() take firmware node as a parameter Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-29 15:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-29 14:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] gpiolib-acpi: Make acpi_gpio_count() " Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-01 6:43 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2024-03-01 8:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] gpiolib: Align prototypes of *gpio_count() APIs Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240301064358.GL8454@black.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox