public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: <linuxarm@huawei.com>, <justin.he@arm.com>, <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 07/18] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-8-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>

struct acpi_scan_handler has a detach callback that is used to remove
a driver when a bus is changed. When interacting with an eject-request,
the detach callback is called before _EJ0.

This means the ACPI processor driver can't use _STA to determine if a
CPU has been made not-present, or some of the other _STA bits have been
changed. acpi_processor_remove() needs to know the value of _STA after
_EJ0 has been called.

Add a post_eject callback to struct acpi_scan_handler. This is called
after acpi_scan_hot_remove() has successfully called _EJ0. Because
acpi_scan_check_and_detach() also clears the handler pointer,
it needs to be told if the caller will go on to call
acpi_bus_post_eject(), so that acpi_device_clear_enumerated()
and clearing the handler pointer can be deferred.
The extra eject flag added in the previous patch is used for this
purpose.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Joanthan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

----
Russell, you hadn't signed off on this when posting last time.
Do you want to insert a suitable tag now?
v5:
 - Rebase to take into account the changes to scan handling in the
   meantime.
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |  4 ++--
 drivers/acpi/scan.c           | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 include/acpi/acpi_bus.h       |  1 +
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 3aa43dee4391..6b2ee0643d11 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
 /* Removal */
-static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
+static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
 	struct acpi_processor *pr;
 
@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler processor_handler = {
 	.ids = processor_device_ids,
 	.attach = acpi_processor_add,
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
-	.detach = acpi_processor_remove,
+	.post_eject = acpi_processor_post_eject,
 #endif
 	.hotplug = {
 		.enabled = true,
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 79b1f4d2b6bd..992779ac31d4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -276,8 +276,6 @@ static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *p)
 	if (handler) {
 		if (handler->detach)
 			handler->detach(adev);
-
-		adev->handler = NULL;
 	} else {
 		device_release_driver(&adev->dev);
 	}
@@ -287,6 +285,28 @@ static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *p)
 	 */
 	acpi_device_set_power(adev, ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD);
 	adev->flags.initialized = false;
+
+	/* For eject this is deferred to acpi_bus_post_eject() */
+	if (!param->eject) {
+		adev->handler = NULL;
+		acpi_device_clear_enumerated(adev);
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int acpi_bus_post_eject(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
+{
+	struct acpi_scan_handler *handler = adev->handler;
+
+	acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_bus_post_eject, NULL);
+
+	if (handler) {
+		if (handler->post_eject)
+			handler->post_eject(adev);
+
+		adev->handler = NULL;
+	}
+
 	acpi_device_clear_enumerated(adev);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -306,6 +326,10 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 	acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
 	unsigned long long sta;
 	acpi_status status;
+	struct acpi_scan_c_and_d_param p = {
+		.check_status = false, /* Not update until after ej0 */
+		.eject = true,
+	};
 
 	if (device->handler && device->handler->hotplug.demand_offline) {
 		if (!acpi_scan_is_offline(device, true))
@@ -318,7 +342,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 
 	acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Ejecting\n");
 
-	acpi_bus_trim(device);
+	acpi_scan_check_and_detach(device, &p);
 
 	acpi_evaluate_lck(handle, 0);
 	/*
@@ -341,6 +365,8 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 	} else if (sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED) {
 		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
 			"Eject incomplete - status 0x%llx\n", sta);
+	} else {
+		acpi_bus_post_eject(device, NULL);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index e193507fd743..27fdef17abe5 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ struct acpi_scan_handler {
 	bool (*match)(const char *idstr, const struct acpi_device_id **matchid);
 	int (*attach)(struct acpi_device *dev, const struct acpi_device_id *id);
 	void (*detach)(struct acpi_device *dev);
+	void (*post_eject)(struct acpi_device *dev);
 	void (*bind)(struct device *phys_dev);
 	void (*unbind)(struct device *phys_dev);
 	struct acpi_hotplug_profile hotplug;
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-12 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-12 14:37 [PATCH v5 00/18] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] cpu: Do not warn on arch_register_cpu() returning -EPROBE_DEFER Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 17:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-22  3:53   ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] ACPI: processor: Set the ACPI_COMPANION for the struct cpu instance Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 18:10   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 15:48     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 16:16       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 16:19         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 16:50           ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 17:34             ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 17:41               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-16 17:35                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] ACPI: processor: Register deferred CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 18:30   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-12 20:16     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-04-12 20:54       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-12 21:52         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-04-12 23:23           ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-15  8:45             ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15  9:16               ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15  9:31                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:57                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:37               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 11:56                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 12:04                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 12:23                     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-16 17:41                       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-16 19:02                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-17 10:39                           ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 12:37                     ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-15 12:41                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 11:51         ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-15 12:51           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 15:31             ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-15 16:38               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-17 15:01                 ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-17 16:19                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 10:52     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:11       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:52       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 11:07     ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-16 14:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd_init and remove pre-processor guards Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] ACPI: utils: Add an acpi_sta_enabled() helper and use it in acpi_processor_make_present() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] ACPI: scan: Add parameter to allow defering some actions in acpi_scan_check_and_detach Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] ACPI: convert acpi_processor_post_eject() to use IS_ENABLED() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] ACPI: Warn when the present bit changes but the feature is not enabled Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] arm64: arch_register_cpu() variant to allow checking of ACPI _STA Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] ACPI: add support to (un)register CPUs based on the _STA enabled bit Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought online Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240412143719.11398-8-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox