From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<rafael@kernel.org>, <bp@alien8.de>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<tony.luck@intel.com>, <dave@stgolabs.net>,
<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] acpi/hmat / cxl: Add extended linear cache support for CXL
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:23:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241126162301.0000090c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241112221335.432583-3-dave.jiang@intel.com>
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 15:12:34 -0700
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:
> The current cxl region size only indicates the size of the CXL memory
> region without accounting for the extended linear cache size. Retrieve the
> cache size from HMAT and append that to the cxl region size for the cxl
> region range that matches the SRAT range that has extended linear cache
> enabled.
>
> The SRAT defines the whole memory range that includes the extended linear
> cache and the CXL memory region. The new HMAT ECN/ECR to the Memory Side
> Cache Information Structure defines the size of the extended linear cache
> size and matches to the SRAT Memory Affinity Structure by the memory
> proxmity domain. Add a helper to match the cxl range to the SRAT memory
> range in order to retrieve the cache size.
>
> There are several places that checks the cxl region range against the
> decoder range. Use new helper to check between the two ranges and address
> the new cache size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Hi Dave,
A few minor comments inline.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/cxl/core/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/cxl/core/acpi.c | 11 ++++++
> drivers/cxl/core/core.h | 3 ++
> drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 2 ++
> include/linux/acpi.h | 19 +++++++++++
> tools/testing/cxl/Kbuild | 1 +
> 8 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/cxl/core/acpi.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> index 39524f36be5b..92b818b72ecc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> @@ -108,6 +108,50 @@ static struct memory_target *find_mem_target(unsigned int mem_pxm)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * hmat_get_extended_linear_cache_size - Retrieve the extended linear cache size
> + * @backing_res: resource from the backing media
> + * @nid: node id for the memory region
> + * @cache_size: (Output) size of extended linear cache.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success. Errno on failure.
> + *
> + */
> +int hmat_get_extended_linear_cache_size(struct resource *backing_res, int nid,
> + resource_size_t *cache_size)
> +{
> + unsigned int pxm = node_to_pxm(nid);
> + struct memory_target *target;
> + struct target_cache *tcache;
> + bool cache_found = false;
> + struct resource *res;
> +
> + target = find_mem_target(pxm);
> + if (!target)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(tcache, &target->caches, node) {
> + if (tcache->cache_attrs.mode == NODE_CACHE_MODE_EXTENDED_LINEAR) {
I'd flip this for slightly better readability.
if (tcache->cache_attrs.mode != NODE_CACHE_MODE_EXTENDED_LINEAR)
continue;
res = ...
> + res = &target->memregions;
> + if (!resource_contains(res, backing_res))
> + continue;
> +
> + cache_found = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!cache_found) {
> + *cache_size = 0;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + *cache_size = tcache->cache_attrs.size;
Why not set this and return in the loop?
That way no need to have a local variable.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(hmat_get_extended_linear_cache_size, CXL);
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/acpi.c b/drivers/cxl/core/acpi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f13b4dae6ac5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/acpi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/* Copyright(c) 2024 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. */
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include "cxl.h"
> +#include "core.h"
Why do you need the cxl headers? Maybe a forwards def of
struct resource, but I'm not seeing anything else being needed.
> +
> +int cxl_acpi_get_extended_linear_cache_size(struct resource *backing_res,
> + int nid, resource_size_t *size)
> +{
> + return hmat_get_extended_linear_cache_size(backing_res, nid, size);
> +}
> @@ -3215,6 +3229,42 @@ static int match_region_by_range(struct device *dev, void *data)
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static int cxl_extended_linear_cache_resize(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
> + struct resource *res)
> +{
> + struct cxl_region_params *p = &cxlr->params;
> + int nid = phys_to_target_node(res->start);
> + resource_size_t size, cache_size;
> + int rc;
> +
> + size = resource_size(res);
> + if (!size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + rc = cxl_acpi_get_extended_linear_cache_size(res, nid, &cache_size);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + if (!cache_size)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (size != cache_size) {
> + dev_warn(&cxlr->dev, "Extended Linear Cache is not 1:1, unsupported!");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Move the start of the range to where the cache range starts. The
> + * implementation assumes that the cache range is in front of the
> + * CXL range. This is not dictated by the HMAT spec but is how the
> + * currently known implementation configured.
is configured
> + */
> + res->start -= cache_size;
> + p->cache_size = cache_size;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-26 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-12 22:12 [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] acpi/hmat / cxl: Add exclusive caching enumeration and RAS support Dave Jiang
2024-11-12 22:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] acpi: numa: Add support to enumerate and store extended linear address mode Dave Jiang
2024-11-26 16:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-12-03 23:05 ` Dave Jiang
2024-11-12 22:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] acpi/hmat / cxl: Add extended linear cache support for CXL Dave Jiang
2024-11-26 16:23 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-12-03 23:08 ` Dave Jiang
2024-11-12 22:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] acpi/hmat: Add helper functions to provide extended linear cache translation Dave Jiang
2024-11-27 10:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-11-12 22:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] cxl: Add extended linear cache address alias emission for cxl events Dave Jiang
2024-11-27 16:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-11-12 22:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] cxl: Add mce notifier to emit aliased address for extended linear cache Dave Jiang
2024-11-13 8:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-13 15:27 ` Dave Jiang
2024-11-14 9:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-14 15:52 ` Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241126162301.0000090c@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox