From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <maurochehab@gmail.com>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] media: ipu-bridge: Fix warning when !ACPI
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 09:14:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241211091147.717e53a4@foz.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241210-fix-ipu-v3-1-00e409c84a6c@chromium.org>
Em Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:55:58 +0000
Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> escreveu:
> One of the quirks that we introduced to build with !ACPI && COMPILE_TEST
> throws the following smatch warning:
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c:752 ipu_bridge_ivsc_is_ready() warn: iterator 'i' not incremented
>
> Fix it by replacing the condition.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202411221147.N6w23gDo-lkp@intel.com/
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202411221147.N6w23gDo-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c
> index a0e9a71580b5..be82bc3e27d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c
> @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ static int ipu_bridge_ivsc_is_ready(void)
>
> for_each_acpi_dev_match(sensor_adev, cfg->hid, NULL, -1) {
> #else
> - while (true) {
> + while (false) {
> sensor_adev = NULL;
> #endif
The better would be to just remove all #if and handle ACPI compatibility
with COMPILE_TEST inside acpi headers.
Besides that, t sounds that patch 2 makes this hack unneeded, as you added
a false check at the for macro:
#define for_each_acpi_dev_match(adev, hid, uid, hrv) \
for (adev = NULL; false && (hid) && (uid) && (hrv);)
Please place only one set of subsystem maintainers at the To: line,
directing to the one(s) you expect to merge this series.
In this particular case, the one to be added should be the ACPI
maintainers.
Regards,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-11 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-10 19:55 [PATCH v3 0/7] ipu6: get rid of all the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-10 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] media: ipu-bridge: Fix warning when !ACPI Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-10 21:03 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-10 21:27 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-11 8:31 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-11 8:27 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-11 8:14 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2024-12-11 8:19 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-10 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] ACPI: bus: implement for_each_acpi_dev_match " Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-10 21:02 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-10 19:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] ACPI: bus: implement acpi_get_physical_device_location " Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-10 20:53 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-10 20:54 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-11 8:16 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-10 19:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] ACPI: header: implement acpi_device_handle " Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-10 20:56 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-10 22:31 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-11 7:58 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-11 11:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-10 19:56 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] ACPI: bus: implement for_each_acpi_consumer_dev " Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-10 20:57 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-10 19:56 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] ACPI: bus: implement acpi_device_hid " Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-10 21:01 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-10 22:35 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-11 7:57 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-11 8:40 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-11 8:48 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-11 8:57 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-10 19:56 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] media: ipu-bridge: Remove unneeded conditional compilations Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-11 8:19 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-11 8:25 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-11 8:50 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-11 8:32 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-11 8:37 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2024-12-11 8:48 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-11 9:14 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-12-11 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] ipu6: get rid of all the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241211091147.717e53a4@foz.lan \
--to=maurochehab@gmail.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ribalda@chromium.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox