From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 363611BEF7D; Thu, 8 May 2025 09:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746697549; cv=none; b=lsffi9pYNpatzA6xCQ8sbGubbLSh8PbyVXqbEPm/FkEw9CkfU6lQKoiSoZrRW58diaB8e3hA5Oorphgl2AxtPFRSyqA90LeyxaP1Cj6Lnwp/FXDQVNjamDJ+IXDmx4rNueqf22WC8wOolQ+FDzxt9JPSrzgTjikcEv125+PPEK8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746697549; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7mgsxlwXgZTpgICxXGcZhTz23FBiew9Od/LMjNg6saI=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RNMuiUn0LnVN1dA6J0OtGwXrwaGtkn7iQ04E6ZhyhjGqog5sQdZXfxmjzuX1J5V+iObfWGFQmCpzQYfiaCWi4MOITmydgEeEcyL7H7x+OUiR38QmMr+asXA4mLYlCQR1qkBBebhMGs0w6WEy7glv5Lr9vZn6gCpQIAlE1wFxucE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4ZtS136R71z6K9Xl; Thu, 8 May 2025 17:45:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8ECC140121; Thu, 8 May 2025 17:45:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Thu, 8 May 2025 11:45:43 +0200 Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 10:45:41 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Alison Schofield CC: Yuquan Wang , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] mm: numa_memblks: introduce numa_add_reserved_memblk Message-ID: <20250508104541.00007c4f@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20250508022719.3941335-1-wangyuquan1236@phytium.com.cn> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500009.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.84) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) On Wed, 7 May 2025 21:09:07 -0700 Alison Schofield wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 10:27:19AM +0800, Yuquan Wang wrote: > > acpi_parse_cfmws() currently adds empty CFMWS ranges to numa_meminfo > > with the expectation that numa_cleanup_meminfo moves them to > > numa_reserved_meminfo. There is no need for that indirection when it is > > known in advance that these unpopulated ranges are meant for > > numa_reserved_meminfo in support of future hotplug / CXL provisioning. > > > > Introduce and use numa_add_reserved_memblk() to add the empty CFMWS > > ranges directly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yuquan Wang > > Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield > > > Yuquan - I'm guessing this is a misunderstanding of process. The patch submitter should pick up tags on previous versions. If any are not picked up in the tag block there should be a clear explanation of why! Jonathan