From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7536226B759; Fri, 22 Aug 2025 15:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755876882; cv=none; b=ekC+D8jbTZv5yug8zcAYwQRqosbuRqQ93+dW8XkbqhJHdgIpgu0n2RjeBvm61vjMew2ZAS34b6/5mzAfMdspZst86acg+znsQvC388fUFScsj+Sa0Nus1E9pQKDFLNyIt9SBS9TbFHIZEosvRxwjePZCOtgieZLe2JMccilIpvo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755876882; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1K3aJddFM7bxDXTS+/2zYCwPDK3GKzRZLqmbZHvYc/U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=HWhmAcG0kjnGTa4eCsFIfO56C4w6xLf5Rz7BEPuoiNlr5tZXBdHaUn/ew5N7yfqobB/g9zU92rRyF8oRZrYY+lt1ZCYZLmyuu96jYSWS9bmwqanGGp9zOoU3z02rlL7P4RetWLksxbsEkWueOs3x9cTvcGwLcw+cQ70sTR6xUaM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818A015A1; Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:34:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merodach.members.linode.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 703143F63F; Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:34:35 -0700 (PDT) From: James Morse To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: James Morse , shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, D Scott Phillips OS , carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles , Xin Hao , peternewman@google.com, dfustini@baylibre.com, amitsinght@marvell.com, David Hildenbrand , Rex Nie , Dave Martin , Koba Ko , Shanker Donthineni , fenghuay@nvidia.com, baisheng.gao@unisoc.com, Jonathan Cameron , Rob Herring , Rohit Mathew , Rafael Wysocki , Len Brown , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Danilo Krummrich Subject: [PATCH 04/33] ACPI / PPTT: Stop acpi_count_levels() expecting callers to clear levels Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 15:30:19 +0000 Message-Id: <20250822153048.2287-39-james.morse@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20250822153048.2287-1-james.morse@arm.com> References: <20250822153048.2287-1-james.morse@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit acpi_count_levels() passes the number of levels back via a pointer argument. It also passes this to acpi_find_cache_level() as the starting_level, and preserves this value as it walks up the cpu_node tree counting the levels. This means the caller must initialise 'levels' due to acpi_count_levels() internals. The only caller acpi_get_cache_info() happens to have already initialised levels to zero, which acpi_count_levels() depends on to get the correct result. Two results are passed back from acpi_count_levels(), unlike split_levels, levels is not optional. Split these two results up. The mandatory 'levels' is always returned, which hides the internal details from the caller, and avoids having duplicated initialisation in all callers. split_levels remains an optional argument passed back. Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: James Morse --- Changes since RFC: * Made acpi_count_levels() return the levels value. --- drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 18 +++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c index 4791ca2bdfac..8f9b9508acba 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c @@ -181,10 +181,10 @@ acpi_find_cache_level(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr, * levels and split cache levels (data/instruction). * @table_hdr: Pointer to the head of the PPTT table * @cpu_node: processor node we wish to count caches for - * @levels: Number of levels if success. * @split_levels: Number of split cache levels (data/instruction) if - * success. Can by NULL. + * success. Can be NULL. * + * Returns number of levels. * Given a processor node containing a processing unit, walk into it and count * how many levels exist solely for it, and then walk up each level until we hit * the root node (ignore the package level because it may be possible to have @@ -192,14 +192,18 @@ acpi_find_cache_level(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr, * split cache levels (data/instruction) that exist at each level on the way * up. */ -static void acpi_count_levels(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr, - struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node, - unsigned int *levels, unsigned int *split_levels) +static int acpi_count_levels(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr, + struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node, + unsigned int *split_levels) { + int starting_level = 0; + do { - acpi_find_cache_level(table_hdr, cpu_node, levels, split_levels, 0, 0); + acpi_find_cache_level(table_hdr, cpu_node, &starting_level, split_levels, 0, 0); cpu_node = fetch_pptt_node(table_hdr, cpu_node->parent); } while (cpu_node); + + return starting_level; } /** @@ -731,7 +735,7 @@ int acpi_get_cache_info(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int *levels, if (!cpu_node) return -ENOENT; - acpi_count_levels(table, cpu_node, levels, split_levels); + *levels = acpi_count_levels(table, cpu_node, split_levels); pr_debug("Cache Setup: last_level=%d split_levels=%d\n", *levels, split_levels ? *split_levels : -1); -- 2.20.1