From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEA5A307ACD; Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755881475; cv=none; b=gRlRg+MjupceW/WT+z8guFZxGUinttJXNpSQ3Xx8nGCbGMRcnVr7hM+/qvRcR71iU7hZLUAcW8JRG+7MMbvCGcF+BXbulmxap/c7f04N2Vve95Sm4GPJZg3p34nT47AZ8ptvnORadiuSgkkdE/Of8URx+p1f/rxXrrwWzr08LWI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755881475; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZN1/GSSsUnr11TA2ChLgQXw36yoz98xor8JyYYUMooQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Jtl/J3BnYQir1ajBt0Nf5+LzYprrQnu2tD6Qm1zuVz4wMUdvJEJj0CgPMoHAVK6tljGMMhTnClcv8zPTKYFBSgYeckcqcDmvKP8Gamfo9bjuU315FTvG3N9wCG4gJmJROrlqSfwLoU4kmJHTqsZaYBtFSovOuFIy4jFsvVooQus= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TOldZ6P4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TOldZ6P4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E68FDC4CEED; Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:51:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755881475; bh=ZN1/GSSsUnr11TA2ChLgQXw36yoz98xor8JyYYUMooQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=TOldZ6P4XjDi8geWUHI4dDlTT6CJl79l8sxl1DywRr/cP9kB878+0JkMA/VKU4RXH 0/0bkecaXvUt55YZXuEbcOHw0QQEAL1sp9aA5eSUXoQNTKa+vwliCqVYL132XwqGYX jOyAVQR7WyYfW21GVtx8cGUCtlMYTOf2rrGtTRMmP3JH/EUTBqXjGU16IcKqKz7gzU ii4KkNruWP1ZjXjkv4hjXC3g1ALdUqATnnaexhDPwrJkflTfRAVA//GsLljIjaCxjq C5TibyaJM2cpWRRjFBbRv2JHLBft3EPEvwjfn3TexdNBE3CTT4r1jCt/Xf9RETQSvX CWUdvouXz1saw== Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 11:51:12 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: "Duan, Zhenzhong" Cc: "Carlis, Matthew" , "Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com" , "Preble, Adam C" , "Schofield, Alison" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "bp@alien8.de" , "Peng, Chao P" , "Williams, Dan J" , "Jiang, Dave" , "dave@stgolabs.net" , "erwin.tsaur@intel.com" , "Wanyan, Feiting" , "Weiny, Ira" , "james.morse@arm.com" , "lenb@kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "lukas@wunner.de" , "mahesh@linux.ibm.com" , "oohall@gmail.com" , "qingshun.wang@linux.intel.com" , "rafael@kernel.org" , "rrichter@amd.com" , "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" , "Luck, Tony" , "Verma, Vishal L" , "Wang, Yudong" , "Saggi, Meeta" , "sconnor@purestorage.com" , "Karkare, Ashish" , "rhan@purestorage.com" , "Rangi, Jasjeet" , "Govindjee, Arjun" , "Amstadt, Bob" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] PCI/AER: Handle Advisory Non-Fatal error Message-ID: <20250822165112.GA688464@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 01:45:30AM +0000, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > Feel free to take it over if you are interested. Maintainer didn't > respond to this series, perhaps he expects some improvement in the > series. I'm terribly sorry, this is my fault. It just fell off my list for no good reason. Matthew, if you are able to test and/or provide a Reviewed-by, that would be the best thing you can do to move this forward (although neither is actually necessary). Bjorn > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Matthew W Carlis > >Subject: [PATCH v5 0/2] PCI/AER: Handle Advisory Non-Fatal error > > > >Hello. My team had independently started to make a change similar to this > >before realizing that someone had already taken a stab at it. It is highly > >desirable in my mind to have an improved handling of Advisory Errors in > >the upstream kernel. Is there anything we can do to help move this effort > >along? Perhaps testing? We have a decent variety of system configurations & > >are able to inject various kinds of errors via special devices/commands etc. > > > >Thanks, > >-Matt