From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B762046BA; Tue, 9 Dec 2025 11:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765278704; cv=none; b=bdRZ2qmcQ3hoDL6iT/ebqXCTUy5iJE6ydfPt6bGvsYkhYADPBdFGMIvrMZfp6HTFbx6hFk1kzzo3Xys3UkdhDL38qbbnLB+REO1OPTYnxj69uh1nMxBV3Zf0FGbxEObO6CqnN/Xt3faTl0qMdcUO4bk2VCoYJ6TwIysNlOBD7sU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765278704; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z/nOVQTJ8VAST9aYHlScqt+p5Qz4dLTAUT/dWtvFh04=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qNVfV1amY4qoZRcQU2pRMbxXwaWsax93hZrbR5kkDUBVYFCSXDXKDqEcm2u0DgtYd9V/dMXlNaSuxS+hxbHw2c2xW/hbHDgwBjL7oVOAFFx5896LiBg3mRjDFVx1TFsn7uYtvHNbtwzh1U1rRSAV3soOuEGahluvYpyTVnm2xkc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=foss.arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=foss.arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815A41691; Tue, 9 Dec 2025 03:11:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e133711.arm.com [10.1.196.55]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B36433F762; Tue, 9 Dec 2025 03:11:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 11:11:37 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Andrea Tomassetti Cc: "jassisinghbrar@gmail.com" , "lenb@kernel.org" , Sudeep Holla , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "lkp@intel.com" , "oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev" , Olivier Dautricourt , "olivierdautricourt@gmail.com" , "rafael@kernel.org" , Thibault Cantori Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mailbox: pcc: support polling mode when there is no platform IRQ Message-ID: <20251209-singing-organic-jackal-b8f2ec@sudeepholla> References: <20251203-persimmon-condor-of-essence-9fc43d@sudeepholla> <20251204125938.3025022-1-andrea.tomassetti@sipearl.com> <20251204-mauve-bear-of-wholeness-e13a4b@sudeepholla> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 10:39:53AM +0000, Andrea Tomassetti wrote: > On 25/12/04 01:14PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > I wouldn't consider that as real platform especially if it is not std. AEM > > models that are well maintained. Many Fast models are short lived and never > > maintained long term, so I don't want to push any feature based on that alone > > unless you have a real platform with missing or broken interrupt that needs > > this polling feature. > > > > It is burden for long term maintenance if there is no regular way to test this > > polling mode feature. > > > Fair, I totally get your point. Thank you very much for your time. > Thanks for understanding. We can always revisit this if this becomes a requirement on a real platform in the future. I am not against that just FYI. -- Regards, Sudeep