From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C48F02F84F; Sun, 21 Dec 2025 19:32:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766345534; cv=none; b=Y9fUA0G2jnxHqZsaAs8XrQLaige0WeBNPNHdSvUGnFEDZL1zMg8bNj6dFd7BoIUyfAUe5M5Yu/Z5USLZlD03kP9aHY6Rcvo2BWtUL3lTXyDcIISvlcDX4lL8Xvg60RLZVnfU6CgI+TmBbWbcG2m5ESzBeGZjz4HeFEkDtOehORw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766345534; c=relaxed/simple; bh=b9Nwd9sXKSYEQNfuaVJPScUfQ1fvQxMuXpR46Wa/4LM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kln3TquclvfcJG5xE7ERShkA2U1ANQl/cvf05S1Q6tCLt7XU5J+vJfsG7rFuC5e3rHUuhCoD5w2RErkOR4vPmR6ZFk/qA1Ur3/7Wqv5999vIa5JZg3rVg9lXR+Lpp5n6/3PlzRByfmEuZIhpX/g2I2PKPc4Bd43HU+WDdLFTOMY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Wuzr45lr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Wuzr45lr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1766345532; x=1797881532; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=b9Nwd9sXKSYEQNfuaVJPScUfQ1fvQxMuXpR46Wa/4LM=; b=Wuzr45lrHAYD6ZghjB9sF76SPdFjJEk1aS1QJk9rEt3vv7xN0FLTc1rK ctAmkmf/JRePX1wjgtiF8Q5+lmA6b55didaCXalFdykeh0ma+iE4CGwya 2wpkcCHVMY6+tG+63IsynkMuEQHz0g3IUr5sZwU4c8aZtYqa/sroI7v0Y dv3ijORrdRXmy+4O7U92URVfmM3NrY8m0kJPvSSb873Cl+Mj+6byvaaNy 1rY5hK8MShxaBXchb7+KP32Ig5ATRvxgmKyJVGMDgT2xeHseGNFgd1j/A dTTcsNWX4Mr+9vAq8nACg0AaTxjsim9dR2qGG6yiYlRi0TWVT8hvBr5e0 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: DDkiu8YMTlegYJYWJL80tg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4BctYJZ6RnCU9da1pm62UQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11649"; a="79582785" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,166,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="79582785" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Dec 2025 11:32:11 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ZAYyN8XSTVSW1Pl8TDrcXg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: k5+MMjNURX+fVBoDoahJDQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,166,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="236766300" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO 8a0c053bdd2a) ([10.211.93.152]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2025 11:32:07 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 8a0c053bdd2a with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vXP9w-000000005DA-2giu; Sun, 21 Dec 2025 19:32:04 +0000 Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 20:31:25 +0100 From: kernel test robot To: Ahmed Tiba , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rafael@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry.Lamerov@arm.com, Michael.Zhao2@arm.com, ahmed.tiba@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] ras: add estatus core implementation Message-ID: <202512212012.arq4zqYv-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251217112845.1814119-3-ahmed.tiba@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251217112845.1814119-3-ahmed.tiba@arm.com> Hi Ahmed, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on efi/next] [also build test WARNING on rafael-pm/linux-next rafael-pm/bleeding-edge robh/for-next linus/master v6.19-rc1 next-20251219] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ahmed-Tiba/ras-add-estatus-core-interfaces/20251217-200718 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251217112845.1814119-3-ahmed.tiba%40arm.com patch subject: [PATCH 02/12] ras: add estatus core implementation config: x86_64-rhel-9.4 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251221/202512212012.arq4zqYv-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251221/202512212012.arq4zqYv-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512212012.arq4zqYv-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/firmware/efi/estatus.c:505:13: warning: 'estatus_cache_add' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 505 | static void estatus_cache_add(struct estatus_source *source, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/firmware/efi/estatus.c:435:12: warning: 'estatus_cached' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 435 | static int estatus_cached(struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/firmware/efi/estatus.c:411:12: warning: 'estatus_print_estatus' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 411 | static int estatus_print_estatus(const char *pfx, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/firmware/efi/estatus.c:340:13: warning: 'estatus_clear_estatus' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 340 | static void estatus_clear_estatus(struct estatus_source *source, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/firmware/efi/estatus.c:321:12: warning: 'estatus_read_estatus' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 321 | static int estatus_read_estatus(struct estatus_source *source, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/firmware/efi/estatus.c:117:12: warning: 'estatus_panic_timeout' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] 117 | static int estatus_panic_timeout __read_mostly = 30; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h:13, from include/linux/uprobes.h:66, from include/linux/mm_types.h:16, from include/linux/mmzone.h:22, from include/linux/gfp.h:7, from include/linux/xarray.h:16, from include/linux/list_lru.h:14, from include/linux/fs/super_types.h:7, from include/linux/fs/super.h:5, from include/linux/fs.h:5, from include/linux/seq_file.h:11, from include/linux/seq_buf.h:7, from include/linux/trace_seq.h:5, from include/linux/cper.h:13, from drivers/firmware/efi/estatus.c:10: drivers/firmware/efi/estatus.c:106:29: warning: 'estatus_report_chain' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] 106 | static ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(estatus_report_chain); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/notifier.h:116:37: note: in definition of macro 'ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD' 116 | struct atomic_notifier_head name = \ | ^~~~ vim +/estatus_panic_timeout +117 drivers/firmware/efi/estatus.c 116 > 117 static int estatus_panic_timeout __read_mostly = 30; 118 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki