public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: PCI: IRQ: Handle INTx GSIs as u32 values not int
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 13:29:30 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260102192930.GA226444@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aVerBwCsuoHadX9K@lpieralisi>

On Fri, Jan 02, 2026 at 12:24:55PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 11:01:50AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 10:26:15AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > In ACPI Global System Interrupts (GSIs) are described using a 32-bit
> > > value.
> > > 
> > > ACPI/PCI legacy interrupts (INTx) parsing code treats GSIs as 'int', which
> > > poses issues if the GSI interrupt value is a 32-bit value with the MSB set
> > > (as required in some interrupt configurations - eg ARM64 GICv5 systems).
> > > 
> > > Fix ACPI/PCI legacy INTx parsing by converting variables representing
> > > GSIs from 'int' to 'u32' bringing the code in line with the ACPI
> > > specification.
> > 
> > Looks good to me.  Is there any symptom of what the issue looks like
> > that could be mentioned here?  Might also be useful in the subject,
> > which currently describes the C code without really saying why we want
> > to do this.
> 
> Thanks ! Happy New Year !

Happy New Year!

> acpi_pci_link_allocate_irq() would return a GSI with MSB set, that the
> logic in acpi_pci_irq_enable() would treat as a failure because that's
> a negative value.
> 
> After fixing that - passing a 32-bit value with MSB set to
> acpi_irq_get_penalty() causes an array acpi_isa_irq_penalty dereference
> with an an index that is way beyond the array size.

Ouch, out-of-bounds reference.  Best case, maybe a data page fault or
a "No IRQ available" message or just a suboptimal IRQ choice.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-01-02 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-31  9:26 [PATCH] ACPI: PCI: IRQ: Handle INTx GSIs as u32 values not int Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-12-31 17:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-02 11:24   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-01-02 19:29     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260102192930.GA226444@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox