From: Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com>
To: rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org
Cc: andy@kernel.org, westeri@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ACPI: pmic: Replace mutex_lock/unlock() with guard()/scoped_guard()
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 17:01:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260424220110.25929-1-m32285159@gmail.com> (raw)
Replace mutex_lock() and unlock() macros with the newer guard() and
scoped_guard() macros. This will help modernize and clean the code.
Refactor control flow in affected functions by using direct returns,
as we no longer need to manually unlock mutexes at the end of
functions. This will simplify the return logic of affected functions.
In intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element(): While at it, remove
now redundant "ret" variable.
Signed-off-by: Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- Refactored control flow in certain functions as suggested by Andy.
- Indent code in scoped_guard block as suggested by Andy.
- Fix parameter list alignment issues that I found while making this
v2.
drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.c | 69 +++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.c b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.c
index 134e9ca8eaa2..5c37a8f28e71 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.c
@@ -67,14 +67,12 @@ static acpi_status intel_pmic_power_handler(u32 function,
if (result == -ENOENT)
return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
- mutex_lock(&opregion->lock);
+ guard(&opregion->lock);
result = function == ACPI_READ ?
d->get_power(regmap, reg, bit, value64) :
d->update_power(regmap, reg, bit, *value64 == 1);
- mutex_unlock(&opregion->lock);
-
return result ? AE_ERROR : AE_OK;
}
@@ -182,27 +180,23 @@ static acpi_status intel_pmic_thermal_handler(u32 function,
if (result == -ENOENT)
return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
- mutex_lock(&opregion->lock);
+ scoped_guard(&opregion->lock) {
- if (pmic_thermal_is_temp(address))
- result = pmic_thermal_temp(opregion, reg, function, value64);
- else if (pmic_thermal_is_aux(address))
- result = pmic_thermal_aux(opregion, reg, function, value64);
- else if (pmic_thermal_is_pen(address))
- result = pmic_thermal_pen(opregion, reg, bit,
+ if (pmic_thermal_is_temp(address))
+ result = pmic_thermal_temp(opregion, reg, function, value64);
+ else if (pmic_thermal_is_aux(address))
+ result = pmic_thermal_aux(opregion, reg, function, value64);
+ else if (pmic_thermal_is_pen(address))
+ result = pmic_thermal_pen(opregion, reg, bit,
function, value64);
- else
- result = -EINVAL;
-
- mutex_unlock(&opregion->lock);
-
- if (result < 0) {
- if (result == -EINVAL)
- return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
else
- return AE_ERROR;
+ return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
+
}
+ if (result < 0)
+ return AE_ERROR;
+
return AE_OK;
}
@@ -345,7 +339,6 @@ int intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element(u16 i2c_address, u32 reg_address,
u32 value, u32 mask)
{
const struct intel_pmic_opregion_data *d;
- int ret;
if (!intel_pmic_opregion) {
pr_warn("%s: No PMIC registered\n", __func__);
@@ -354,30 +347,28 @@ int intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element(u16 i2c_address, u32 reg_address,
d = intel_pmic_opregion->data;
- mutex_lock(&intel_pmic_opregion->lock);
+ guard(&intel_pmic_opregion->lock);
if (d->exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element) {
- ret = d->exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element(intel_pmic_opregion->regmap,
- i2c_address, reg_address,
- value, mask);
- } else if (d->pmic_i2c_address) {
+ return d->exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element(intel_pmic_opregion->regmap,
+ i2c_address, reg_address,
+ value, mask);
+ }
+
+ if (d->pmic_i2c_address) {
if (i2c_address == d->pmic_i2c_address) {
- ret = regmap_update_bits(intel_pmic_opregion->regmap,
- reg_address, mask, value);
- } else {
- pr_err("%s: Unexpected i2c-addr: 0x%02x (reg-addr 0x%x value 0x%x mask 0x%x)\n",
- __func__, i2c_address, reg_address, value, mask);
- ret = -ENXIO;
+ return regmap_update_bits(intel_pmic_opregion->regmap,
+ reg_address, mask, value);
}
- } else {
- pr_warn("%s: Not implemented\n", __func__);
- pr_warn("%s: i2c-addr: 0x%x reg-addr 0x%x value 0x%x mask 0x%x\n",
- __func__, i2c_address, reg_address, value, mask);
- ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
- }
- mutex_unlock(&intel_pmic_opregion->lock);
+ pr_err("%s: Unexpected i2c-addr: 0x%02x (reg-addr 0x%x value 0x%x mask 0x%x)\n",
+ __func__, i2c_address, reg_address, value, mask);
+ return -ENXIO;
+ }
- return ret;
+ pr_warn("%s: Not implemented\n", __func__);
+ pr_warn("%s: i2c-addr: 0x%x reg-addr 0x%x value 0x%x mask 0x%x\n",
+ __func__, i2c_address, reg_address, value, mask);
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element);
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-24 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 22:01 Maxwell Doose [this message]
2026-04-27 0:08 ` [PATCH v2] ACPI: pmic: Replace mutex_lock/unlock() with guard()/scoped_guard() Maxwell Doose
2026-04-27 7:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-27 14:37 ` Maxwell Doose
2026-04-27 9:28 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260424220110.25929-1-m32285159@gmail.com \
--to=m32285159@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=westeri@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox