From: "Mario Limonciello (AMD)" <superm1@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki ⏎" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] ACPI: CPPC: Add support for reading HighestFreq
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:55:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260427035520.1427080-4-superm1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427035520.1427080-1-superm1@kernel.org>
A future revision of the ACPI specification will be including
a definition for HighestFreq. Add support for reading it.
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org>
---
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 7 ++++++-
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
index cbfebc50b6eab..f446ef5f7305b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_caps, cppc_perf_caps, lowest_nonlinear_perf);
show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_caps, cppc_perf_caps, guaranteed_perf);
show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_caps, cppc_perf_caps, lowest_freq);
show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_caps, cppc_perf_caps, nominal_freq);
+show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_caps, cppc_perf_caps, highest_freq);
show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_ctrs, cppc_perf_fb_ctrs, wraparound_time);
@@ -222,6 +223,7 @@ static struct attribute *cppc_attrs[] = {
&nominal_perf.attr,
&nominal_freq.attr,
&lowest_freq.attr,
+ &highest_freq.attr,
NULL
};
ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(cppc);
@@ -751,19 +753,20 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr)
/*
* Disregard _CPC if the number of entries in the return package is not
* as expected, but support future revisions being proper supersets of
- * the v3 and only causing more entries to be returned by _CPC.
+ * the v4 and only causing more entries to be returned by _CPC.
*/
if ((cpc_rev == CPPC_V2_REV && num_ent != CPPC_V2_NUM_ENT) ||
(cpc_rev == CPPC_V3_REV && num_ent != CPPC_V3_NUM_ENT) ||
(cpc_rev == CPPC_V4_REV && num_ent != CPPC_V4_NUM_ENT) ||
- (cpc_rev > CPPC_V4_REV && num_ent <= CPPC_V4_NUM_ENT)) {
+ (cpc_rev == CPPC_V5_REV && num_ent != CPPC_V5_NUM_ENT) ||
+ (cpc_rev > CPPC_V5_REV && num_ent <= CPPC_V5_NUM_ENT)) {
pr_debug("Unexpected number of _CPC return package entries (%d) for CPU:%d\n",
num_ent, pr->id);
goto out_free;
}
- if (cpc_rev > CPPC_V4_REV) {
- num_ent = CPPC_V4_NUM_ENT;
- cpc_rev = CPPC_V4_REV;
+ if (cpc_rev > CPPC_V5_REV) {
+ num_ent = CPPC_V5_NUM_ENT;
+ cpc_rev = CPPC_V5_REV;
}
cpc_ptr->num_entries = num_ent;
@@ -1361,9 +1364,10 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps)
struct cpc_desc *cpc_desc = per_cpu(cpc_desc_ptr, cpunum);
struct cpc_register_resource *highest_reg, *lowest_reg,
*lowest_non_linear_reg, *nominal_reg, *reference_reg,
- *guaranteed_reg, *low_freq_reg = NULL, *nom_freq_reg = NULL;
+ *guaranteed_reg, *low_freq_reg = NULL, *nom_freq_reg = NULL,
+ *highest_freq_reg = NULL;
u64 high, low, guaranteed, nom, ref, min_nonlinear,
- low_f = 0, nom_f = 0;
+ low_f = 0, nom_f = 0, high_f = 0;
int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, cpunum);
struct cppc_pcc_data *pcc_ss_data = NULL;
int ret = 0, regs_in_pcc = 0;
@@ -1380,6 +1384,7 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps)
reference_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[REFERENCE_PERF];
low_freq_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[LOWEST_FREQ];
nom_freq_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[NOMINAL_FREQ];
+ highest_freq_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[HIGHEST_FREQ];
guaranteed_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[GUARANTEED_PERF];
/* Are any of the regs PCC ?*/
@@ -1387,7 +1392,7 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps)
CPC_IN_PCC(lowest_non_linear_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(nominal_reg) ||
(CPC_SUPPORTED(reference_reg) && CPC_IN_PCC(reference_reg)) ||
CPC_IN_PCC(low_freq_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(nom_freq_reg) ||
- CPC_IN_PCC(guaranteed_reg)) {
+ CPC_IN_PCC(guaranteed_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(highest_freq_reg)) {
if (pcc_ss_id < 0) {
pr_debug("Invalid pcc_ss_id\n");
return -ENODEV;
@@ -1450,7 +1455,7 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps)
goto out_err;
}
- /* Read optional lowest and nominal frequencies if present */
+ /* Read optional lowest, highest and nominal frequencies if present */
if (CPC_SUPPORTED(low_freq_reg)) {
ret = cpc_read(cpunum, low_freq_reg, &low_f);
if (ret)
@@ -1463,9 +1468,15 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps)
goto out_err;
}
+ if (CPC_SUPPORTED(highest_freq_reg)) {
+ ret = cpc_read(cpunum, highest_freq_reg, &high_f);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_err;
+ }
+
perf_caps->lowest_freq = low_f;
perf_caps->nominal_freq = nom_f;
-
+ perf_caps->highest_freq = high_f;
out_err:
if (regs_in_pcc)
diff --git a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
index 38bf9013c6e2e..79f1eef957a45 100644
--- a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
+++ b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
@@ -21,14 +21,16 @@
#define CPPC_V2_REV 2
#define CPPC_V3_REV 3
#define CPPC_V4_REV 4
+#define CPPC_V5_REV 5
#define CPPC_V2_NUM_ENT 21
#define CPPC_V3_NUM_ENT 23
#define CPPC_V4_NUM_ENT 25
+#define CPPC_V5_NUM_ENT 27
#define PCC_CMD_COMPLETE_MASK (1 << 0)
#define PCC_ERROR_MASK (1 << 2)
-#define MAX_CPC_REG_ENT 23
+#define MAX_CPC_REG_ENT 25
/* CPPC specific PCC commands. */
#define CMD_READ 0
@@ -114,6 +116,8 @@ enum cppc_regs {
NOMINAL_FREQ,
OSPM_NOMINAL_PERF,
RESOURCE_PRIO,
+ HIGHEST_FREQ,
+ CURRENT_FREQ,
};
/*
@@ -131,6 +135,7 @@ struct cppc_perf_caps {
u32 lowest_nonlinear_perf;
u32 lowest_freq;
u32 nominal_freq;
+ u32 highest_freq;
};
struct cppc_perf_ctrls {
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 3:55 [PATCH 0/6] Add CPPC HighestFreq support Mario Limonciello (AMD)
2026-04-27 3:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] Revert "ACPI: CPPC: Adjust debug messages in amd_set_max_freq_ratio() to warn" Mario Limonciello (AMD)
2026-04-27 3:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] ACPI: Add CPPC v4 definitions Mario Limonciello (AMD)
2026-04-27 3:55 ` Mario Limonciello (AMD) [this message]
2026-04-27 3:55 ` [PATCH 4/6] ACPI: CPPC: Refactor boost ratio handling Mario Limonciello (AMD)
2026-04-27 3:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq: Use amd_get_boost_ratio() Mario Limonciello (AMD)
2026-04-27 3:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Get highest freq from CPPC if available Mario Limonciello (AMD)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260427035520.1427080-4-superm1@kernel.org \
--to=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox