From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4774A2E3C; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 13:42:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785332529; cv=none; b=AA1HmneH2ZITA0bJdoo/b5cCwOLPe7iah95HLYPUbUI3vSdUHBOSWbY9pHuqkcdxXU+GOmJC+1qME3uKkcmYGpJzn5G7vA7/SW650GZ5RaExvmjUmmokltZBAe+/EVqqaomOvcgvU1xYvAwTNfqYDqwr7GhrKChbAkrnf1jq/1A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785332529; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gFWFVKbiczu1tbQpF65sJQ5MgfZteaR6jRjtAc8c+XQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=Xg/GtUTUROWcG1RQIVtjw15K5NmoZtyBLCl4BtLuOVm/OAnxUjoa0PfmRnUjFzesUKh1y4utI4P+Le4EkqXdO8g/4XzN4Mwolkes0dJkZ36KEvea+OWWiAo7dWaS+IwvdiKAcBLJRDn/QNQCm0fDCIGEaJPUsrhhFPXFt1U3tyw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b=RtuzCjuQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b="RtuzCjuQ" Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7BD168F; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 06:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e142021.fritz.box (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98E2A3F86F; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 06:42:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1785332526; bh=gFWFVKbiczu1tbQpF65sJQ5MgfZteaR6jRjtAc8c+XQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RtuzCjuQPyfa7oV4jBb+dl5nbkHsXpY/tHeOQs/SwzV8w0EOOeGZcuRTh93vMp+AT 4gZBi/8sE7SqF/F461xBzP+cemjCg/HEbIUoyzJLUnZuf/SlX+j2Vk4ypypPomjKva IxLbF4nxsouoMiy8gqG0uB6h8BQDHB+CvCYMirjI= From: Andre Przywara To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , James Morse , Ben Horgan , Reinette Chatre , Fenghua Yu Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Srivathsa L Rao , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , Trilok Soni , Srinivas Ramana , Niyas Sait , Lee Trager , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 07/10] arm_mpam: prepare mon_sel locking for MPAM-Fb Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 15:41:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20260729134124.2506269-8-andre.przywara@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20260729134124.2506269-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> References: <20260729134124.2506269-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The MSC MON_SEL register needs to be accessed from hardirq for the overflow interrupt, and when taking an IPI to access these registers on platforms where MSCs are not accesible from every CPU. This makes an irqsave spinlock the obvious lock to protect these registers. On systems with MPAM-Fb mailbox MSC access it must be able to sleep, meaning a mutex must be used. So MPAM-Fb platforms cannot support an overflow interrupt easily. Clearly these two methods can't exist for one MSC at the same time. Change the mon_sel locking wrapper function to only use a spinlock when the MSC is accessed directly via MMIO. In case of MPAM-Fb, we use a mutex, but only if we are in a sleepable context. If that's not the case, we return an error. This should not happen, as MPAM-Fb by design does not require an MSC access to happen from a specific CPU, so there is no need for any IPIs or preemption disabling to satisfy CPU constraints. And since overflow interrupts are not supported at the moment anyway, we also wouldn't meet the other case. Bailing out early is already happening in rare occasions today. Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara --- drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 5 ++++- drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c index 9b6d266b4fa6..f6910ab3bbc2 100644 --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c @@ -2230,7 +2230,10 @@ static struct mpam_msc *do_mpam_msc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (err) return ERR_PTR(err); - mpam_mon_sel_lock_init(msc); + err = mpam_mon_sel_lock_init(dev, msc); + if (err) + return ERR_PTR(err); + msc->id = pdev->id; msc->pdev = pdev; INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&msc->all_msc_list); diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h index 57f2b3dbf7d0..2b81b6b0bf4e 100644 --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ struct mpam_msc { */ raw_spinlock_t _mon_sel_lock; unsigned long _mon_sel_flags; + struct mutex mon_sel_mutex; void __iomem *mapped_hwpage; size_t mapped_hwpage_sz; @@ -139,27 +140,50 @@ struct mpam_msc { /* Returning false here means accesses to mon_sel must fail and report an error. */ static inline bool __must_check mpam_mon_sel_lock(struct mpam_msc *msc) { - /* Locking will require updating to support a firmware backed interface */ - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(msc->iface != MPAM_IFACE_MMIO)) + if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO) { + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&msc->_mon_sel_lock, msc->_mon_sel_flags); + + return true; + } + + if (!preemptible()) return false; - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&msc->_mon_sel_lock, msc->_mon_sel_flags); + mutex_lock(&msc->mon_sel_mutex); + return true; } static inline void mpam_mon_sel_unlock(struct mpam_msc *msc) { - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msc->_mon_sel_lock, msc->_mon_sel_flags); + if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO) { + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msc->_mon_sel_lock, + msc->_mon_sel_flags); + + return; + } + + mutex_unlock(&msc->mon_sel_mutex); } static inline void mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(struct mpam_msc *msc) { - lockdep_assert_held_once(&msc->_mon_sel_lock); + if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO) + lockdep_assert_held_once(&msc->_mon_sel_lock); + else + lockdep_assert_held_once(&msc->mon_sel_mutex); } -static inline void mpam_mon_sel_lock_init(struct mpam_msc *msc) +static inline int mpam_mon_sel_lock_init(struct device *dev, + struct mpam_msc *msc) { - raw_spin_lock_init(&msc->_mon_sel_lock); + if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO) { + raw_spin_lock_init(&msc->_mon_sel_lock); + + return 0; + } + + return devm_mutex_init(dev, &msc->mon_sel_mutex); } DEFINE_GUARD(mon_sel, struct mpam_msc *, -- 2.43.0