From: Hongyan Xu <getshell@seu.edu.cn>
To: rafael@kernel.org
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn,
Hongyan Xu <getshell@seu.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ACPI: scan: fix bus ID cleanup on device_add() failure
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2026 16:59:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260808085943.526-1-getshell@seu.edu.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804154854.1555-1-getshell@seu.edu.cn>
When device_add() fails after acpi_device_set_name() has allocated an
instance ID and linked a new acpi_device_bus_id into acpi_bus_id_list, the
rollback path only removes wakeup_list and detaches the ACPI handle data.
That leaves the bus-ID bookkeeping behind and keeps the allocated instance
number consumed.
Move the bus-ID cleanup and wakeup-list removal into a single helper.
Use it from both the normal device teardown path and the device_add()
rollback path. The wakeup list node is initialized before registration, so
it can be deleted without checking whether the device is wakeup-capable, as
in the original teardown path.
Found by manual review of reports from the
kernel70rc2-fail11-retry-20260801 run.
Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xu <getshell@seu.edu.cn>
---
v2:
- Fold the bus-ID cleanup and wakeup-list removal into one helper to avoid
duplicating the same sequence in acpi_device_del() and the device_add()
rollback path.
- Drop the wakeup.flags.valid check before list_del(&device->wakeup_list).
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20260804154854.1555-1-getshell@seu.edu.cn/
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index ff7000b71fd1..a311af60d8d3 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -520,12 +520,10 @@ static void acpi_device_release(struct device *dev)
kfree(acpi_dev);
}
-static void acpi_device_del(struct acpi_device *device)
+static void acpi_device_del_list(struct acpi_device *device)
{
struct acpi_device_bus_id *acpi_device_bus_id;
- mutex_lock(&acpi_device_lock);
-
list_for_each_entry(acpi_device_bus_id, &acpi_bus_id_list, node)
if (!strcmp(acpi_device_bus_id->bus_id,
acpi_device_hid(device))) {
@@ -540,6 +538,13 @@ static void acpi_device_del(struct acpi_device *device)
}
list_del(&device->wakeup_list);
+}
+
+static void acpi_device_del(struct acpi_device *device)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&acpi_device_lock);
+
+ acpi_device_del_list(device);
mutex_unlock(&acpi_device_lock);
@@ -800,7 +805,7 @@ int acpi_device_add(struct acpi_device *device)
err:
mutex_lock(&acpi_device_lock);
- list_del(&device->wakeup_list);
+ acpi_device_del_list(device);
err_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&acpi_device_lock);
--
2.50.1.windows.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-08 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 15:48 [PATCH] ACPI: scan: fix bus ID cleanup on device_add() failure Hongyan Xu
2026-08-07 17:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-08-08 8:59 ` Hongyan Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260808085943.526-1-getshell@seu.edu.cn \
--to=getshell@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox