From: Eduardo Ruiz Duarte <toorandom@gmail.com>
To: sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, bingbu.cao@intel.com, djrscally@gmail.com
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, tian.shu.qiu@intel.com,
lixu.zhang@intel.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eduardo Ruiz Duarte <toorandom@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] media: ipu-bridge: hold a reference on the IVSC software node
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 15:15:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261011131518.48838-1-toorandom@gmail.com> (raw)
ipu_bridge_instantiate_ivsc() attaches the IVSC software node to the mei-csi
device with set_secondary_fwnode(), but never takes a reference on it, while
the driver core unconditionally drops one when that device goes away.
device_add() calls software_node_notify(), which does a kobject_get() on the
swnode behind dev_fwnode(dev). device_del() calls
software_node_notify_remove(), which does the matching kobject_put() -- and
that put sits *outside* the "if (swnode->managed)" block, so it runs for every
device whose fwnode is a software node, managed or not:
sysfs_remove_link(&swnode->kobj, dev_name(dev));
sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "software_node");
kobject_put(&swnode->kobj);
if (swnode->managed) {
set_secondary_fwnode(dev, NULL);
kobject_put(&swnode->kobj);
}
csi_dev is the mei-csi device, which the MEI client bus has already added by
the time ipu_bridge_instantiate_ivsc() runs. The add-side get therefore never
happens for this node, but the del-side put always does.
On hardware where the MEI bus resets -- which it does on every s2idle and S4
resume on a Dell XPS 13 9340 -- mei-csi is destroyed and recreated each cycle,
so the node loses one reference per resume. INTC10CF-N starts at 3: one for its
own registration plus one for each of its two port children, since
kobject_add() of a child takes a reference on the parent. The third resume
therefore frees it, software_node_find_by_name() starts returning NULL, and
isys walks the fwnode graph into freed memory:
refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free
WARNING: lib/refcount.c:25 at refcount_warn_saturate+0x7e/0xb0
kobject_get+0x94/0xb0
software_node_graph_get_port_parent+0x89/0xd0
fwnode_graph_get_port_parent+0x70/0xd0
fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id+0x93/0x280
isys_notifier_init+0x92/0x180 [intel_ipu6_isys]
isys_register_devices+0x3c9/0x4e0 [intel_ipu6_isys]
isys_probe+0x3df/0x500 [intel_ipu6_isys]
auxiliary_bus_probe+0x4c/0x70
...
deferred_probe_work_func+0xa5/0x110
followed by an underflow and a saturate on the same kobject, and the camera
never comes back.
Take a reference so the attachment owns one, balancing the put the core will do
when csi_dev is destroyed. Where csi_dev is never destroyed this leaks a single
kobject reference, which is what the lifetime of the node already assumes.
Found while making the camera survive hibernation on a Dell XPS 13 9340
(ov02c10 behind an INTC10CF IVSC); with suspend-then-hibernate the first cycle
burns two resumes, so the failure consistently showed up on the second
hibernation. Tested on 7.0.0-1015-oem: two consecutive hibernations with the
node alive throughout and no refcount warnings, where before the second one
hung the machine.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Ruiz Duarte <toorandom@gmail.com>
---
drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c
@@ -765,6 +765,15 @@
if (!fwnode)
return -ENODEV;
+ /*
+ * Balance the kobject_put() that software_node_notify_remove() will do
+ * on this node when csi_dev is destroyed. That put is unconditional,
+ * while the matching get in software_node_notify() only happens at
+ * device_add() time -- and csi_dev was added before we got here, so it
+ * never ran for this node.
+ */
+ fwnode_handle_get(fwnode);
+
set_secondary_fwnode(sensor->csi_dev, fwnode);
return 0;
--
2.51.0
reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261011131518.48838-1-toorandom@gmail.com \
--to=toorandom@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lixu.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tian.shu.qiu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox