Linux ACPI
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Nguyen <jamien@nvidia.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>
Cc: Jamie Nguyen <jamien@nvidia.com>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Dat Mach <dmach@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI: FFH: Support FF-A direct request 2 calls
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 13:11:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261103211136.4122648-1-jamien@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103173907.1996118-3-sudeep.holla@kernel.org>

On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 05:39:07PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
[...]
> +	if (!acpi_ffh_ffa_version_negotiated) {
> +		args.a0 = FFA_VERSION;
> +		args.a1 = FFA_VERSION_1_2;

Same question as on the earlier thread: how does this work if the
transport driver has already negotiated a version?

[...]
> +	ret = acpi_ffh_ffa_features(ffh_ctxt, FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET_REGS);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;

I think REGS is only needed when X1 is zero, and if I understand
correctly it's optional at the Non-secure physical instance. Would it
make sense to check it in the lookup path instead, so an explicit
receiver ID still works without it?

[...]
> +	memcpy(&args.a4, &buf[4], len - 4 * sizeof(u64));

I believe this would trip FORTIFY_SOURCE's field-spanning write check.
So I suggest:

	memcpy((void *)&args + offsetof(struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs, a4),
	       &buf[4], len - 4 * sizeof(u64));

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-03 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-03 17:39 [PATCH 0/2] ACPI: Arm FFH: Add support for OpRegion Offset 2 (FF-A DIRECT_REQ2) Sudeep Holla
2026-11-03 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] firmware: arm_ffa: Share FF-A register field definitions Sudeep Holla
2026-11-03 17:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI: FFH: Support FF-A direct request 2 calls Sudeep Holla
2026-11-03 21:11   ` Jamie Nguyen [this message]
2026-11-04  9:40     ` Sudeep Holla
2026-11-03 22:53   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-11-04 10:19     ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261103211136.4122648-1-jamien@nvidia.com \
    --to=jamien@nvidia.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dmach@nvidia.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox