Re: Regression in 3.10.80 vs. 3.10.79

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>]

On Monday, June 15, 2015 07:56:05 AM Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com> wrote:
> > Below is a more sophisticated, so to speak, version of it with a changelog and
> > all.  It works for me, but more testing would be much appreciated.
> 
> Yes, the patch works as expected:
> 
> Tested-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>

Awesome, thanks a lot for the confirmation!

I'll send it Linuswards for final 4.1.

> It does change /proc/ioports heirarchy to
> 
>   0400-0403 : ACPI PM1a_EVT_BLK
>   0404-0405 : ACPI PM1a_CNT_BLK
>   0406-0407 : pnp 00:06
>   0408-040b : ACPI PM_TMR
>   040c-041f : pnp 00:06
>     0410-0415 : ACPI CPU throttle
>   0420-042f : ACPI GPE0_BLK
>   0430-044f : pnp 00:06
>     0430-0433 : iTCO_wdt
>       0430-0433 : iTCO_wdt
>   0450-0450 : ACPI PM2_CNT_BLK
>   0451-047f : pnp 00:06
>     0460-047f : iTCO_wdt
>       0460-047f : iTCO_wdt
> 
> where the old kernel had
> 
>   0400-047f : pnp 00:06
>     0400-0403 : ACPI PM1a_EVT_BLK
>     0404-0405 : ACPI PM1a_CNT_BLK
>     0408-040b : ACPI PM_TMR
>     0410-0415 : ACPI CPU throttle
>     0420-042f : ACPI GPE0_BLK
>     0430-0433 : iTCO_wdt
>       0430-0433 : iTCO_wdt
>     0450-0450 : ACPI PM2_CNT_BLK
>     0460-047f : iTCO_wdt
>       0460-047f : iTCO_wdt
> 
> but I don't think that matters.

No, it doesn't.

Thanks,
Rafael