From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: qiwuchen55@gmail.com
Cc: lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
chenqiwu <chenqiwu@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: list_for_each_safe() -> list_for_each_entry_safe()
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 11:57:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2166554.vSs1JGyd92@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1582438102-29488-1-git-send-email-qiwuchen55@gmail.com>
On Sunday, February 23, 2020 7:08:22 AM CET qiwuchen55@gmail.com wrote:
> From: chenqiwu <chenqiwu@xiaomi.com>
>
> Use list_for_each_entry_safe() instead of list_for_each_safe()
> to simplify code.
>
> Signed-off-by: chenqiwu <chenqiwu@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/proc.c | 14 ++++++--------
> drivers/acpi/wakeup.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/proc.c b/drivers/acpi/proc.c
> index 0e62ef2..7892980 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/proc.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/proc.c
> @@ -22,14 +22,13 @@
> static int
> acpi_system_wakeup_device_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
> {
> - struct list_head *node, *next;
> + struct acpi_device *dev, *tmp;
>
> seq_printf(seq, "Device\tS-state\t Status Sysfs node\n");
>
> mutex_lock(&acpi_device_lock);
> - list_for_each_safe(node, next, &acpi_wakeup_device_list) {
> - struct acpi_device *dev =
> - container_of(node, struct acpi_device, wakeup_list);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &acpi_wakeup_device_list,
> + wakeup_list) {
> struct acpi_device_physical_node *entry;
>
> if (!dev->wakeup.flags.valid)
> @@ -96,7 +95,7 @@ static void physical_device_enable_wakeup(struct acpi_device *adev)
> const char __user * buffer,
> size_t count, loff_t * ppos)
> {
> - struct list_head *node, *next;
> + struct acpi_device *dev, *tmp;
> char strbuf[5];
> char str[5] = "";
>
> @@ -109,9 +108,8 @@ static void physical_device_enable_wakeup(struct acpi_device *adev)
> sscanf(strbuf, "%s", str);
>
> mutex_lock(&acpi_device_lock);
> - list_for_each_safe(node, next, &acpi_wakeup_device_list) {
> - struct acpi_device *dev =
> - container_of(node, struct acpi_device, wakeup_list);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &acpi_wakeup_device_list,
> + wakeup_list) {
> if (!dev->wakeup.flags.valid)
> continue;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c b/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> index 9614126..c28244d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> @@ -30,12 +30,10 @@
> */
> void acpi_enable_wakeup_devices(u8 sleep_state)
> {
> - struct list_head *node, *next;
> -
> - list_for_each_safe(node, next, &acpi_wakeup_device_list) {
> - struct acpi_device *dev =
> - container_of(node, struct acpi_device, wakeup_list);
> + struct acpi_device *dev, *tmp;
>
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &acpi_wakeup_device_list,
> + wakeup_list) {
> if (!dev->wakeup.flags.valid
> || sleep_state > (u32) dev->wakeup.sleep_state
> || !(device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev)
> @@ -57,12 +55,10 @@ void acpi_enable_wakeup_devices(u8 sleep_state)
> */
> void acpi_disable_wakeup_devices(u8 sleep_state)
> {
> - struct list_head *node, *next;
> -
> - list_for_each_safe(node, next, &acpi_wakeup_device_list) {
> - struct acpi_device *dev =
> - container_of(node, struct acpi_device, wakeup_list);
> + struct acpi_device *dev, *tmp;
>
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &acpi_wakeup_device_list,
> + wakeup_list) {
> if (!dev->wakeup.flags.valid
> || sleep_state > (u32) dev->wakeup.sleep_state
> || !(device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev)
> @@ -79,13 +75,11 @@ void acpi_disable_wakeup_devices(u8 sleep_state)
>
> int __init acpi_wakeup_device_init(void)
> {
> - struct list_head *node, *next;
> + struct acpi_device *dev, *tmp;
>
> mutex_lock(&acpi_device_lock);
> - list_for_each_safe(node, next, &acpi_wakeup_device_list) {
> - struct acpi_device *dev = container_of(node,
> - struct acpi_device,
> - wakeup_list);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &acpi_wakeup_device_list,
> + wakeup_list) {
> if (device_can_wakeup(&dev->dev)) {
> /* Button GPEs are supposed to be always enabled. */
> acpi_enable_gpe(dev->wakeup.gpe_device,
>
Applied with modified subject and changelog as 5.7 material, thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-04 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-23 6:08 [PATCH] acpi: list_for_each_safe() -> list_for_each_entry_safe() qiwuchen55
2020-03-04 10:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2166554.vSs1JGyd92@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=chenqiwu@xiaomi.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qiwuchen55@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox