From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54EBE257B; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 04:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714363598; cv=none; b=OH0k/nU1mNTu9pQRiUIg40eK+uY+wZuMBtnfbvO4PmZMgwbZZ5g7DF7v6QBOuXuaYWzApBWPx3k6N0g+SzKfzL/fUMdwMVUkgIaxPGXGPrb7+NTVI0r+iAGUBm7KWVMws4aYuFbyFpidGk4rfgb3j99aDN2Hp9RKxU3NZwrhYzo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714363598; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FD3ViZaLK0wtg7lH2KbwGb7HN39zndU5EWw+ZK7vnaw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=uCU66FuSXL9hSXKcziDeSDh46Qc0rw2bHBf7iv3CepMsu+IZd8Ph7ZZs5th458x0LA73tRo4BZZQyS9Ja9Jg0aVxRMRJ7pET5750DmNWB8Up29cqEmKyVMjvs2cE/iPKHKF/5ldCkWiGPhsKhxjS5DZZsEY4j7UFUAcUXEVbYZM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Gd3FvGYW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Gd3FvGYW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1714363596; x=1745899596; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FD3ViZaLK0wtg7lH2KbwGb7HN39zndU5EWw+ZK7vnaw=; b=Gd3FvGYW6tIn0YnJgvu17mzgIWGQ0xRDhGLPdC7kiM7DlqkDMALfuZJE kFQoPXXyCEFtKoZEhdrsiBJewBvgb65FtwNeVuzvsX6FlQc71wZZGugnp cH3VidNQZodNUbP7mODAuJ+9XWUETV6KxqBVyUvP71TI7CSwCeqif1NtX UlWVMjJoP3ZucsJIw/zg53r1/e0IkzaP5Q6q7iwMZsGPtWTEnnf6C0bv7 PSLmfeswzFdjS4MYP9emZVxJKLEhYVU+RhSFLq+MZDFFTvKCTZNXfbM8Z vIEhHJJmGdUHO84ednkIgV4gmvO5WUc544fIhU9ovbjG4j5ki5EVjSS4R A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Ks6MsBGKQOenRQES7iSdPA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: giSd5P3bTCKNvtNUwaTA+Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11057"; a="20565179" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,238,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="20565179" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Apr 2024 21:06:36 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fVjHxYRMQvC1b0sDcXa9Ww== X-CSE-MsgGUID: uFmKF7yfSqah2LD348K8LQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,238,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="26001296" Received: from kscheema-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.251.17.13]) ([10.251.17.13]) by fmviesa008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Apr 2024 21:06:35 -0700 Message-ID: <228f5064-bf3d-4872-bcf7-b941f001d9dd@linux.intel.com> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 21:06:34 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Declare acpi_blacklisted() only if CONFIG_X86 is enabled To: Andy Shevchenko , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown References: <20240407063341.3710801-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 4/23/24 6:02 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 06:37:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 8:33 AM Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan >> wrote: > ... > >> Applied (as 6.10 material), but it looks to me like this declaration >> could be moved away from this header file at all, as the function is >> only used in one place in arch-x86 code. > Yes, we probably may move it to asm/acpi.h for x86. > > I don't remember if I ever expressed that idea, but I definitely was thinking > about this. > Makes sense. I have moved it to asm/acpi.h https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240429040441.748479-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com/T/#u -- Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Linux Kernel Developer