From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/4] cpufreq: Make drivers using CPUFREQ_ETERNAL specify transition latency
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 17:44:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2346363.iZASKD2KPV@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8605612.T7Z3S40VBb@rafael.j.wysocki>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit a755d0e2d41b ("cpufreq: Honour transition_latency over
transition_delay_us") caused platforms where cpuinfo.transition_latency
is CPUFREQ_ETERNAL to get a very large transition latency whereas
previously it had been capped at 10 ms (and later at 2 ms).
This led to a user-observable regression between 6.6 and 6.12 as
described by Shawn:
"The dbs sampling_rate was 10000 us on 6.6 and suddently becomes
6442450 us (4294967295 / 1000 * 1.5) on 6.12 for these platforms
because the default transition delay was dropped [...].
It slows down dbs governor's reacting to CPU loading change
dramatically. Also, as transition_delay_us is used by schedutil
governor as rate_limit_us, it shows a negative impact on device
idle power consumption, because the device gets slightly less time
in the lowest OPP."
Evidently, the expectation of the drivers using CPUFREQ_ETERNAL as
cpuinfo.transition_latency was that it would be capped by the core,
but they may as well return a default transition latency value instead
of CPUFREQ_ETERNAL and the core need not do anything with it.
Accordingly, introduce CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS and make
all of the drivers in question use it instead of CPUFREQ_ETERNAL.
Fixes: a755d0e2d41b ("cpufreq: Honour transition_latency over transition_delay_us")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250922125929.453444-1-shawnguo2@yeah.net/
Reported-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: 6.6+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.6+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 3 +++
7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_p
transition_latency = dev_pm_opp_get_max_transition_latency(cpu_dev);
if (!transition_latency)
- transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
+ transition_latency = CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS;
cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, priv->cpus);
policy->driver_data = priv;
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ soc_opp_out:
}
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-latency", &transition_latency))
- transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
+ transition_latency = CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS;
/*
* Calculate the ramp time for max voltage change in the
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struc
latency = readl_relaxed(data->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_LATENCY]) * 1000;
if (!latency)
- latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
+ latency = CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS;
policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = latency;
policy->fast_switch_possible = true;
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_init(struct cpuf
latency = perf_ops->transition_latency_get(ph, domain);
if (!latency)
- latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
+ latency = CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS;
policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = latency;
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static int scpi_cpufreq_init(struct cpuf
latency = scpi_ops->get_transition_latency(cpu_dev);
if (!latency)
- latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
+ latency = CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS;
policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = latency;
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int spear_cpufreq_probe(struct pl
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-latency",
&spear_cpufreq.transition_latency))
- spear_cpufreq.transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
+ spear_cpufreq.transition_latency = CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS;
cnt = of_property_count_u32_elems(np, "cpufreq_tbl");
if (cnt <= 0) {
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@
*/
#define CPUFREQ_ETERNAL (-1)
+
+#define CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TANSITION_LATENCY_NS NSEC_PER_MSEC
+
#define CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN 16
/* Print length for names. Extra 1 space for accommodating '\n' in prints */
#define CPUFREQ_NAME_PLEN (CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN + 1)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 15:42 [PATCH v1 0/4] cpufreq: Fixes and cleanups related to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 15:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-09-25 16:37 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] cpufreq: Make drivers using CPUFREQ_ETERNAL specify transition latency Mario Limonciello
2025-09-26 9:46 ` Jie Zhan
2025-09-25 15:44 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Avoid using CPUFREQ_ETERNAL as transition delay Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 16:36 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-09-26 9:41 ` Jie Zhan
2025-09-25 15:46 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] ACPI: CPPC: Replace CPUFREQ_ETERNAL with CPPC-specific symbol Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 16:35 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-09-25 16:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ACPI: CPPC: Do not use CPUFREQ_ETERNAL as an error value Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 18:33 ` Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)
2025-09-26 9:30 ` Jie Zhan
2025-09-26 10:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 15:47 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] cpufreq: Drop unused symbol CPUFREQ_ETERNAL Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-25 16:36 ` Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)
2025-09-26 9:47 ` Jie Zhan
2025-09-29 7:28 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] cpufreq: Fixes and cleanups related to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2346363.iZASKD2KPV@rafael.j.wysocki \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=pprakash@codeaurora.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox