From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nick Bartos" Subject: Re: acpi=force safe? Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:46:49 -0600 (CST) Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <24294.65.164.3.3.1076107609.squirrel@mail.diamondcpu.com> References: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401CBB685@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com> <16644.65.164.3.3.1076087775.squirrel@mail.diamondcpu.com> <20040206211334.GH13262@poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20040206211334.GH13262-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > > That part of the firmware may be broken, and you may have hang on boot > (even though I think it is safe now without lapic support even on old > laptops). > I am compiling it with smp support, so I think it automatically puts in lapic support. Is it a bad idea to do that? I don't have any smp boxes yet but I wanted to support it if possible. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn