From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] ACPICA: 20160422 Release
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 01:49:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2434982.zKfILYtmTK@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1462418912.git.lv.zheng@intel.com>
On Thursday, May 05, 2016 12:57:47 PM Lv Zheng wrote:
> The 20160422 ACPICA kernel-resident subsystem updates are linuxized based
> on the linux-pm/linux-next branch.
>
> NOTE:
> 1. Indentation improvement
> The [PATCH 01] is a result of an ACPICA release process fix. It requires
> much of human intervention, and many linuxized patches in the developers'
> local working repositories that are not upstreamed to the ACPICA will be
> burnt by this commit, and may take weeks or months for the developers to
> recover. So hope we can do it correctly and rapidly.
>
> 2. AcessSize/BitOffset support
> ACPICA implements ACPI hardware register accesses using ACPI 1.0 style,
> which contains only BLK/LEN fields. ACPI 2.0 starts to use Generic Address
> Structure to define hardware registers, the ACPI 1.0 fields can be
> translated into Address/BitWidth fields and ACPI 2.0 defines new
> AccessSize/BitOffset fields as an extension. While the ACPICA code of the
> GAS support is still Address/BitWidth aware only. This becomes one of the
> significant ACPI 2.0 gaps in ACPICA.
> But as we have already switched the address favor to 64-bit (aka., favor
> GAS descriptors) and there is almost no regression report, enabling
> AccessSize/BitOffset awareness seems to be just a theoretical issue because
> there is no existing users requiring this, and enabling it might just be an
> ecosystem enabling work for the future users.
> So the most important thing of this improvement is to ensure regression
> safer by keeping old behavior working. [PATCH 08] is thus generated for
> this purpose. After ensuring this, we need this improvement to appear in
> the upstream to have more users to test it so that we can learn unknown
> cases from the feedback.
>
> The patchset has passed the following build/boot tests.
> Build tests are performed as follows:
> 1. i386 + allyes
> 2. i386 + allno
> 3. i386 + default + ACPI_DEBUGGER=y
> 4. i386 + default + ACPI_DEBUGGER=n + ACPI_DEBUG=y
> 5. i386 + default + ACPI_DEBUG=n + ACPI=y
> 6. i386 + default + ACPI=n
> 7. x86_64 + allyes
> 8. x86_64 + allno
> 9. x86_64 + default + ACPI_DEBUGGER=y
> 10.x86_64 + default + ACPI_DEBUGGER=n + ACPI_DEBUG=y
> 11.x86_64 + default + ACPI_DEBUG=n + ACPI=y
> 12.x86_64 + default + ACPI=n
> Boot tests are performed as follows:
> 1. i386 + default + ACPI_DEBUGGER=y
> 2. x86_64 + default + ACPI_DEBUGGER=y
> Where:
> 1. i386: machine named as "Dell Inspiron Mini 1010"
> 2. x86_64: machine named as "HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC"
> 3. default: kernel configuration with following items enabled:
> All hardware drivers related to the machines of i386/x86_64
> All "drivers/acpi" configurations
> All "drivers/platform" drivers
> All other drivers that link the APIs provided by ACPICA subsystem
>
> The divergences checking result:
> Before applying (20160318 Release):
> 494 lines
> After applying (20160422 Release):
> 485 lines
> The reduction is caused by recently merged module level improvement.
>
> Bob Moore (7):
> ACPICA: Refactor evaluate_object to reduce nesting
> ACPICA: ACPI 6.1: Support for new PCCT subtable
> ACPICA: ACPI 6.0: Update _BIX support for new package element
> ACPICA: ACPI 6.0, tools/iasl: Add support for new resource
> descriptors
> ACPICA: Renamed some #defined flag constants for clarity
> ACPICA: Move all ASCII utilities to a common file
> ACPICA: Update version to 20160422
>
> Lv Zheng (6):
> ACPICA: Divergence: remove unwanted spaces for typedef
> ACPICA: Utilities: Add ACPI_IS_ALIGNED() macro
> ACPICA: Hardware: Add optimized access bit width support
> ACPICA: Executer: Introduce a set of macros to handle bit width mask
> generation
> ACPICA: ACPI 2.0, Hardware: Add access_width/bit_offset support in
> acpi_hw_read()
> ACPICA: ACPI 2.0, Hardware: Add access_width/bit_offset support for
> acpi_hw_write()
All [1-13/13] applied, thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-05 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-04 5:47 [PATCH 00/15] ACPICA: 20160422 Release Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 5:48 ` [PATCH 01/15] ACPICA: Linuxize: reduce divergences for 20160422 release Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 21:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-04 21:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-05 2:16 ` Zheng, Lv
2016-05-05 2:15 ` Zheng, Lv
2016-05-04 5:48 ` [PATCH 02/15] ACPICA: Divergence: remove unwanted spaces for typedef Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 5:48 ` [PATCH 03/15] ACPICA: Refactor evaluate_object to reduce nesting Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 5:48 ` [PATCH 04/15] ACPICA: ACPI 6.1: Support for new PCCT subtable Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 5:48 ` [PATCH 05/15] ACPICA: ACPI 6.0: Update _BIX support for new package element Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 5:48 ` [PATCH 06/15] ACPICA: ACPI 6.0, tools/iasl: Add support for new resource descriptors Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 5:48 ` [PATCH 07/15] ACPICA: Renamed some #defined flag constants for clarity Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 5:48 ` [PATCH 08/15] ACPICA: Dispatcher: Update thread ID for recursive method calls Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 15:10 ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-05-04 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-04 20:30 ` Mario_Limonciello
2016-05-04 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-04 5:49 ` [PATCH 09/15] ACPICA: Utilities: Add ACPI_IS_ALIGNED() macro Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 5:49 ` [PATCH 10/15] ACPICA: Hardware: Add optimized access bit width support Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 5:49 ` [PATCH 11/15] ACPICA: Executer: Introduce a set of macros to handle bit width mask generation Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 5:49 ` [PATCH 12/15] ACPICA: Hardware: Add access_width/bit_offset support in acpi_hw_read() Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 5:49 ` [PATCH 13/15] ACPICA: Hardware: Add access_width/bit_offset support for acpi_hw_write() Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 5:49 ` [PATCH 14/15] ACPICA: Move all ASCII utilities to a common file Lv Zheng
2016-05-04 5:49 ` [PATCH 15/15] ACPICA: Update version to 20160422 Lv Zheng
2016-05-05 4:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] ACPICA: 20160422 Release Lv Zheng
2016-05-05 4:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] ACPICA: Divergence: remove unwanted spaces for typedef Lv Zheng
2016-05-05 4:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] ACPICA: Refactor evaluate_object to reduce nesting Lv Zheng
2016-05-05 4:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] ACPICA: ACPI 6.1: Support for new PCCT subtable Lv Zheng
2016-05-05 4:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] ACPICA: ACPI 6.0: Update _BIX support for new package element Lv Zheng
2016-05-05 4:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] ACPICA: ACPI 6.0, tools/iasl: Add support for new resource descriptors Lv Zheng
2016-05-05 4:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] ACPICA: Renamed some #defined flag constants for clarity Lv Zheng
2016-05-05 4:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] ACPICA: Utilities: Add ACPI_IS_ALIGNED() macro Lv Zheng
2016-05-05 4:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] ACPICA: Hardware: Add optimized access bit width support Lv Zheng
2016-05-25 19:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-05-26 16:26 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-26 16:55 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-05-26 21:59 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-05-27 3:24 ` Zheng, Lv
2016-05-27 7:34 ` Zheng, Lv
2016-05-27 17:31 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-05-27 3:14 ` Zheng, Lv
2016-05-05 4:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] ACPICA: Executer: Introduce a set of macros to handle bit width mask generation Lv Zheng
2016-05-05 4:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] ACPICA: ACPI 2.0, Hardware: Add access_width/bit_offset support in acpi_hw_read() Lv Zheng
2016-05-05 5:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] ACPICA: ACPI 2.0, Hardware: Add access_width/bit_offset support for acpi_hw_write() Lv Zheng
2016-05-05 5:00 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] ACPICA: Move all ASCII utilities to a common file Lv Zheng
2016-05-05 5:00 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] ACPICA: Update version to 20160422 Lv Zheng
2016-05-05 23:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2434982.zKfILYtmTK@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=zetalog@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox