From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: ACPI regression with 3.19+ Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 23:03:50 +0100 Message-ID: <2682430.9eTeHiC8BR@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <54F18BD9.8040200@punnoor.de> <1674953.ShOInfAyGW@vostro.rjw.lan> <1425323240.1125.17.camel@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:58820 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752896AbbCBVkS convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2015 16:40:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1425323240.1125.17.camel@gmail.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Hudd Cc: Prakash Punnoor , jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, March 02, 2015 10:07:20 PM Hudd wrote: > On Sun, 2015-03-01 at 01:00 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday, February 28, 2015 10:35:21 AM Prakash Punnoor wrote: > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > > --------------080704070901080904040008 > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dutf-8 > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > >=20 > > > Hallo, > > >=20 > > > my system won't boot with current GIT kernel (see attached screen= shot). > > > The system seems somewhat frozen (cannot ssh into it), but magic = sysrq > > > still works. I bisected the problem to commit > > > 593669c2ac0fe18baee04a3cd5539a148aa48574. > >=20 > > Thanks for reporting, we're working on it. >=20 > Hello folks, >=20 > I've tried out 4.0-rc1, and it does not boot on my system. It j= ust > freezes without any messages (The only message I see is =E2=80=9CLoad= ing initial > ramdisk=E2=80=9D from GRUB). I bisected the problem down to the same= commit as > in this report. >=20 > # first bad commit: [593669c2ac0fe18baee04a3cd5539a148aa48574] > x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify impleme= ntation So at the moment I'm inclined to revert it. Clearly, it wasn't thought through enough, so my suggestion would be to revert it for 4.0 and try = again in the next cycle and be more careful this time. Gerry, would it cause problems to happen if I reverted this one? --=20 I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html