From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI:remove panic in case hardware has changed after S4 Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:40:09 +0200 Message-ID: <2772497.7moIZd7YLR@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1373544870-15135-1-git-send-email-oliver@neukum.org> <1373618715.7539.106.camel@linux-s257.site> <5742401.D3Ye1zZPh5@linux-5eaq.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:43358 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755641Ab3GOLaQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2013 07:30:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5742401.D3Ye1zZPh5@linux-5eaq.site> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Oliver Neukum Cc: joeyli , Thomas Renninger , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Monday, July 15, 2013 01:29:47 PM Oliver Neukum wrote: > On Friday 12 July 2013 16:45:15 joeyli wrote: > > > Per information from OEM, Windows 8 didn't really block S4 resume when > > hardware_signature not match, I think as Oliver's patch. > > Is that confidential information? > > If it is indeed true, introducing a blacklist makes no sense. And I > see no alternative to my patch. Should I resubmit with an improved > comment? Yes, it would be good to update the changelog with this info. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.