From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI: Force I2C to be selected as a built-in module
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:25:58 -0500
Message-ID: <2902c0aa-b7d4-ea2f-e687-bc5cd19631e1@codeaurora.org>
References: <1516895011-17588-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
 <CAJZ5v0h2TOvoNGx5nYU0yVp_GJCxLTStSY=mp2YMbazhfq3x9g@mail.gmail.com>
 <30a108bc-c85f-55d9-67c5-586534a987c0@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:39534 "EHLO
        smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750990AbeBFO0D (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:26:03 -0500
In-Reply-To: <30a108bc-c85f-55d9-67c5-586534a987c0@infradead.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>

Hi Rafael,

On 1/25/2018 12:36 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/25/2018 08:25 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>> From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> If I2C is built as a module, ACPI_I2C_OPREGION cannot be set
>>> and any ACPI opregion calls targeting I2C fail with no opregion found.
>>>
>>> Commit da3c6647ee08 ("I2C/ACPI: Clean up I2C ACPI code and Add
>>> CONFIG_I2C_ACPI config") says following:
>>>
>>> "Current there is a race between removing I2C ACPI operation region
>>> and ACPI AML code accessing."
>>>
>>> This patch forces core I2C support to be compiled as a built-in
>>> module if ACPI is selected as code is not ready for dynamic module
>>> removal.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 2 ++
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>>> index 4650539..5b48098 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>>> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ menuconfig ACPI
>>>         depends on IA64 || X86 || ARM64
>>>         depends on PCI
>>>         select PNP
>>> +       # force building I2C in on ACPI systems, for opregion availability
>>> +       imply I2C
>>>         default y if (IA64 || X86)
>>>         help
>>>           Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) support for
>>> --
>>
>> I'm not sure how much this helps.
>>
>> I2C opregions will only work if the requisite I2C controller driver is
>> present anyway and this change doesn't guarantee that AFAICS.
>>
>> OTOH, there are systems using ACPI without I2C opregions, so are we
>> really better off by forcing everybody using ACPI to also build I2C?
> 
> Definitely not.
> 

Where do we stand on this? Do you have a better suggestion?


Sinan

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.