From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 RESEND] mailbox: add ACPI support for mailbox framework Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 04:04:46 +0200 Message-ID: <2931755.BICyILJPre@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1428537507-30561-1-git-send-email-fkan@apm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:52316 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932508AbbDVBkG (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:40:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Jassi Brar Cc: Feng Kan , patches , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 04:53:14 PM Jassi Brar wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Feng Kan wrote: > > > > Just want to ping this. I haven't gotten any response from mailbox > > maintainer for this > > patch or any of my other mailbox patches. > > > Sorry I had been busy and still need to have a critical look at the > new api. It would sooth my nerves to see an ACK from some acpi god. I'm far from one, but I'll be looking at this is detail next week if that helps (this week I'm traveling). > Btw, we also have ACPI-PCC specific api recently added. Yeah, so I'm wondering how this is related (if at all). -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.