From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 076FB59B4E; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.15.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710368944; cv=none; b=Szuy3aCYg0nyORkpZ+GRQWkB02RW7Vb/zsRiOR2al8npN0nnaBkPGrhsxQ3s11mlKKxVLsFtnCQwJbb80hitvlZyXGpQrz/yR3wESmnW/91fC/7eDA9gAUVU16GCfii+m7dt1lpTG9Gjk4BtqdTJGnc1DfVgivjbDDoGYYlwbaE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710368944; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cD01GlzbpDft9/egkt97qgIoWlbkMTHG3rZa/g6LfpM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=qx+s3dhLOwodz/LLa6D2d6j6ou3OUzDD8xrKXDH/nldVrM+4h2J6nZe1u8OO0vv+SPWBAMzzudQOS01vuiTu4F2rX+iAw2NlcQ4u3JITVi0JuOKMoXpIKtbgl1A7MdQNxNykc2HA2bkshquo6r09c5c9FOoWS5pXg1VUquM4WXE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=gmx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.de header.i=w_armin@gmx.de header.b=id6RFgIT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.15.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=gmx.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmx.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.de header.i=w_armin@gmx.de header.b="id6RFgIT" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1710368935; x=1710973735; i=w_armin@gmx.de; bh=20CbePg34fNBEaE5jWgFVZCXbm8KLekGbiZqGqIC5I4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To; b=id6RFgITiDN9dNIZ1+pwKLeZgGpJUGo19CHjCLJD2Ai8oDRD0YMZYlvxAYEtbNjM /IzUSC+wbUK85WCx7oeDPgbSDKGI4mUlioHn/z8KIEShrvFuIVtObUggwaY2Uoy5p 4jyKgONPMbom6rV4zkBfAc5e3QM+z5NGKquAfBp/vVwIXxFqGl0q9Z9tWa7o6ZM7V e3rER6JWZxASKiVG5T0A4x3uJ+60+bLs9JDjvczalR9eax9K6VbE98fZ8h7mG6qPQ RvZGauXQZrxh72zpDxA6xemf2ZnS4VhVnUcQODogcOcZ3blcT1sjgb+pHj2+lYQEL hTMLdJ3v4wPniev1Rg== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from [141.30.226.129] ([141.30.226.129]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M89Gj-1rfsWq324h-005Ewb; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:28:55 +0100 Message-ID: <2e8100b0-d87c-413e-bcb1-b91c3ce41633@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:28:55 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: bus: _OSC fixes To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240309201310.7548-1-W_Armin@gmx.de> Content-Language: en-US From: Armin Wolf In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:wI++P+1b+yKc3YfUm2hj1g7DmaS99w7cJz6RXTctsALxs2etRWd ywx1NcFkSLsO8QpJQIVn8/1XbUkmdt10xTqWn0DdzXFBHyFey3Y2eekSkWtgK7oEuJ9VNDT 6B1nA/6qiefS6P0fcSt7ogVznZkh4DVh7KfG8otKP+7SawOeJ1bG7nzNvyX7sv3Un+PlI2+ DB3NIafcmslS8mOecEM0A== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:P2LB0CjAtRs=;UnbPdXSB8tyXnF5xg20gQT1w9ys JMctO74RNrzAl1GH29HunkOTFQ4sZqPUDY7ohOKeMMfsloHeDZgDOyer2mLzK5FFPpMu1IBeD 0H1ZHWTSFrzfFaeJtvOXm6HI5bpyxTEVL5E9cawTXXxT0STq6R0452CERoHHG1w2AXhHdzsNI 0mmEynM9voaN7qRJfmC4ZiUEnJ6zQi1E2FssXXQVJ/JPAxq82Dih2mr0VsTJb5CHh10WEdBcQ pmqQ4qO36zcQg1gwdltwAK8NyRk+EADiqYokRmaTA9JNj1Z1o2wFvWp5S+bE7nJuuGcYZoAIG KLxzIuPgTltbvHXKkhb1N27Zxuf/1ke77+MbkJQOST8Mbq5etdubuiTDQ9y1BYzQuFDzn+LM5 z9IlF3o5Dum4pjBEUekolvUrBPtdZH8aAqI9g7z7JcU10PwqdNj9Ay0+q0RYxaUtuFYX0Qth/ lB7nebHVcsQciVE53u7RLJaVnSfCH4kRnoKc5KB5KWNXbacHdDNto3OkI10uPfuBQt5Oqysob OTseHYAl6Xc6WRhcA8Gi9M1s1tXzIC5Gv2FlnhVj5RaqcWqXEsauHp6iUUts1IjqFxVz0d2Bi UyZLY3eOBt10hEy92CwH5PDk19CH+/URD2BBoPdTM3tlOxzD20XW5EccPjSftUeJFiQ50+aNr N/NMDlEuj+w8T3SrCP62hdElmBygnk4CLzcUHByKOm3mX1LT7UKIyNK2wtTx3+2F7Uz26s9ZK 5PSwEJJbxY6NX/6EY59gacnsH1jMdG85RcGCr81DyUJ4fsFNhFGoIx+J2NiM9Ubmm/mzWRXVl 7q8K79JU8z9B51bF+B20paDAWyz2EN1uuB6rkvMZ+nVSc= Am 12.03.24 um 21:10 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 9:13=E2=80=AFPM Armin Wolf wrote= : >> This patch series fixes the handling of various ACPI features bits >> when evaluating _OSC. >> >> The first three patches fix the reporting of various features supported >> by the kernel, while the fourth patch corrects the feature bit used to >> indicate support for the "Generic Initiator Affinity" in SRAT. >> >> The last patch fixes the reporting of IRQ ResourceSource support. Unlik= e >> the other feature bits, the ACPI specification states that this feature >> bit might be used by the ACPI firmware to indicate whether or not it >> supports the usage of IRQ ResourceSource: >> >> "If not set, the OS may choose to ignore the ResourceSource >> parameter in the extended interrupt descriptor." >> >> Since the code responsible for parsing IRQ ResourceSource already check= s >> if ResourceSource is present, i assumed that we can omit taking this >> into account. >> >> All patches where tested on a Asus Prime B650-Plus and a Dell Inspiron >> 3505. >> >> Armin Wolf (5): >> ACPI: bus: Indicate support for _TFP thru _OSC >> ACPI: bus: Indicate support for more than 16 p-states thru _OSC >> ACPI: bus: Indicate support for the Generic Event Device thru _OSC >> ACPI: Fix Generic Initiator Affinity _OSC bit >> ACPI: bus: Indicate support for IRQ ResourceSource thru _OSC >> >> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 5 +++++ >> include/linux/acpi.h | 6 +++++- >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> -- > All of that looks reasonable to me, but do you know about systems in > the field where any of these patches actually fix functionality? > > If not, I'd prefer to queue them up for 6.10 as they are likely to > change behavior, at least in corner cases. > > Thanks! Hi, i know no system which even queries those feature bits, so i am fine with this landing in 6.10. Thanks, Armin Wolf