Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor: allowing probing on platforms with one ACPI C-state

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>]

On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 9:26:07 AM CEST Zhang Rui wrote:
> It is possible for ACPI _CST to return only one ACPI C-state, for
> example, when deep cstate disabled in the BIOS.
> And it is better for the acpi_idle driver to probe in this case as well
> for consistency.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 9 ++-------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> index dcc289e30166..75534c5b5433 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -308,11 +308,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_power_info_cst(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * It is expected that there will be at least 2 states, C1 and
> -	 * something else (C2 or C3), so fail if that is not the case.
> -	 */
> -	if (pr->power.count < 2)
> +	if (!pr->power.count)
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  
>  	pr->flags.has_cst = 1;
> @@ -468,8 +464,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_cstate_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>  	for (i = 1; i < ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_POWER; i++) {
>  		if (pr->power.states[i].valid) {
>  			pr->power.count = i;
> -			if (pr->power.states[i].type >= ACPI_STATE_C2)
> -				pr->flags.power = 1;
> +			pr->flags.power = 1;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> 

Applied as 5.8-candidate material, thanks!