From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Covington Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/5] ECAM quirks handling for ARM64 platforms Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 18:40:47 -0400 Message-ID: <304377c6-554d-60ea-30df-006e557c7279@codeaurora.org> References: <1473449047-10499-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <20160920192636.GB4941@localhost> <0429663d51ed8e93fb0c96261dd2ecc7@codeaurora.org> <20160921131107.GB10804@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:48896 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755315AbcIUWkw (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2016 18:40:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160921131107.GB10804@localhost> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Tomasz Nowicki , will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com, arnd@arndb.de, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, okaya@codeaurora.org, jchandra@broadcom.com, dhdang@apm.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com, mw@semihalf.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com, wangyijing@huawei.com, msalter@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, jcm@redhat.com, andrea.gallo@linaro.org, jeremy.linton@arm.com, liudongdong3@huawei.com, gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com, jhugo@codeaurora.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bjorn, On 09/21/2016 09:11 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 09:15:14PM -0400, cov@codeaurora.org wrote: >>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >>> index eb14f74..bb3b8ad 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >>> @@ -42,86 +42,59 @@ struct mcfg_fixup { >>> struct resource cfgres; >>> }; >>> >>> -#define MCFG_DOM_ANY (-1) >> >> Did you delete this because there were no current users, because you'd >> prefer users just use "-1", or for some other reason? > > I removed it because there were no users of it and, more importantly, > the code doesn't implement support for it. It looks like a stale "First match against PCI topology ..." comment remains. Thanks, Cov -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.